Round 15 — BAM TEAMS QUALIFICATION
16 matches. → cumulative standings · → board records
Round 15 results↑ top
Every match of the round — teams, board-a-match points and VPs. Click a table number or ‘protocol’ for the full board-by-board scorecard below.
| Table | Home team | Visiting team | BAM (home) | BAM (visit) | VP (home) | VP (visit) | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | YOUNG SWEDES | FRANCE SENIORS | 3 | 1 | 3.00 | 1.00 | protocol → |
| 2 | LATVIA | DE KNIJFF | 1 | 3 | 1.00 | 3.00 | protocol → |
| 3 | LUPO VELOCE | NEMESIS | 2 | 2 | 2.00 | 2.00 | protocol → |
| 4 | GOVINDACHARI TEAM | NONAME | 1 | 3 | 1.00 | 3.00 | protocol → |
| 5 | BELL | MORAN | 2 | 2 | 2.00 | 2.00 | protocol → |
| 6 | BYE | SALAMA | 2 | 2 | 0.00 | 2.40 | protocol → |
| 7 | NONAME TUR | CHINA LADIES TEAM | 0 | 4 | 0.00 | 4.00 | protocol → |
| 8 | BRENO | TALMAT | 2 | 2 | 2.00 | 2.00 | protocol → |
| 9 | FORMIDABLES | CUNEO | 1 | 3 | 1.00 | 3.00 | protocol → |
| 10 | BLUE CHIP SWEDES | HARRIS | 4 | 0 | 4.00 | 0.00 | protocol → |
| 11 | MAROSAMITAWA | MARILL | 2 | 2 | 2.00 | 2.00 | protocol → |
| 12 | TESSIERES | PAUNCZ | 1 | 3 | 1.00 | 3.00 | protocol → |
| 13 | BYE | ESTONIA | 2 | 2 | 0.00 | 2.40 | protocol → |
| 14 | BRUNET | NEVER CLAIM | 2 | 2 | 2.00 | 2.00 | protocol → |
| 15 | NETHERLANDS RED | AJ DIAMENT | 4 | 0 | 4.00 | 0.00 | protocol → |
| 16 | PACIFIC | POLAND | 2 | 2 | 2.00 | 2.00 | protocol → |
Standings after round 15↑ top
Cumulative board-a-match points through round 15 — the league table as it stood after this round. → full standings, every round & players
| Place | Team | Pts | R15 | Pld |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | YOUNG SWEDES | 38.40 | 3.00 | 15 |
| 2 | NETHERLANDS RED | 37.40 | 4.00 | 15 |
| 3 | NONAME | 36.40 | 3.00 | 15 |
| 4 | MAROSAMITAWA | 35.40 | 2.00 | 15 |
| 5 | BRUNET | 34.40 | 2.00 | 15 |
| 5 | NEMESIS | 34.40 | 2.00 | 15 |
| 5 | NONAME TUR | 34.40 | 0.00 | 15 |
| 5 | TESSIERES | 34.40 | 1.00 | 15 |
| 9 | CONNECTOR | 33.40 | · | 0 |
| 9 | DE BOTTON | 33.40 | · | 0 |
| 9 | DRACULA | 33.40 | · | 0 |
| 9 | EMERALD | 33.40 | · | 0 |
| 9 | FRANCE JUNIORS | 33.40 | · | 0 |
| 9 | MAHAFFEY | 33.40 | · | 0 |
| 9 | NETHERLANDS BLUE | 33.40 | · | 0 |
| 9 | PAUNCZ | 33.40 | 3.00 | 15 |
| 9 | VINCIGUERRA | 33.40 | · | 0 |
| 18 | BRENO | 32.40 | 2.00 | 15 |
| 18 | MORAN | 32.40 | 2.00 | 15 |
| 20 | DE KNIJFF | 31.40 | 3.00 | 15 |
| 20 | POLAND | 31.40 | 2.00 | 15 |
| 22 | NEVER CLAIM | 31.00 | 2.00 | 15 |
| 23 | BLUE CHIP SWEDES | 30.40 | 4.00 | 15 |
| 23 | ESTONIA | 30.40 | 2.40 | 15 |
| 23 | FORMIDABLES | 30.40 | 1.00 | 15 |
| 26 | AJ DIAMENT | 29.40 | 0.00 | 15 |
| 26 | BELL | 29.40 | 2.00 | 15 |
| 26 | SALAMA | 29.40 | 2.40 | 15 |
| 29 | CUNEO | 28.40 | 3.00 | 15 |
| 29 | LATVIA | 28.40 | 1.00 | 15 |
| 29 | TALMAT | 28.40 | 2.00 | 15 |
| 32 | LUPO VELOCE | 27.40 | 2.00 | 15 |
| 33 | FRANCE SENIORS | 26.40 | 1.00 | 15 |
| 33 | PACIFIC | 26.40 | 2.00 | 15 |
| 35 | GOVINDACHARI TEAM | 25.40 | 1.00 | 15 |
| 36 | CHINA LADIES TEAM | 25.00 | 4.00 | 15 |
| 37 | MARILL | 22.40 | 2.00 | 15 |
| 38 | HARRIS | 16.40 | 0.00 | 15 |
Board-a-match over this round's field — each pair's net boards won per board (2-0 win / 1-1 tie), shown as a board-a-match %.
Round 15 board-a-match standings↑ top
| Place | Player | Team | Boards | R15 | BAM% |
|---|
YOUNG SWEDES vs FRANCE SENIORS 3 : 1 VP (match 33142) PBN↑ top
⚠ line-ups not published by EBL for this match — board results only, no per-player Butler.
| Bd | Open room | Closed room | IMPs | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | YOUNG SWEDES | FRANCE SENIORS | |
| 29 | 3NT | E | ♥7 | +1 | 630 | 89% | 3NT | W | ♦6 | +2 | 660 | 98% | 2 | |||
| 30 | 6NT | E | ♥6 | = | 990 | 52% | 6NT | E | ♠7 | = | 990 | 52% | 1 | 1 | ||
| Σ | BAM / points | NS-0.8 | NS-1.0 | 3 | 1 | |||||||||||
| Bd | Cont | By | Res | NS | EW | Butler | BAM | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| home | visit | |||||||
| 29 | 3NT | E | +1 | 630 | 89% | 2 | ||
| 3NT | W | +2 | 660 | 98% | ||||
| 30 | 6NT | E | = | 990 | 52% | 1 | 1 | |
| 6NT | E | = | 990 | 52% | ||||
| Σ | BAM Open | NS-0.8 | 3 | 1 | ||||
| BAM Closed | NS-1.0 | |||||||
| Player | Bds | Total | Avg |
|---|
LATVIA vs DE KNIJFF 1 : 3 VP (match 33143) PBN↑ top
⚠ line-ups not published by EBL for this match — board results only, no per-player Butler.
| Bd | Open room | Closed room | IMPs | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | LATVIA | DE KNIJFF | |
| 29 | 3NT | E | ♦6 | -1 | 100 | 89% | 4♠ | E | ♥3 | -1 | 100 | 89% | 1 | 1 | ||
| 30 | 6NT | E | ♥6 | +1 | 1020 | 77% | 4NT | E | ♥3 | +2 | 490 | 84% | 2 | |||
| Σ | BAM / points | NS+0.2 | NS+1.5 | 1 | 3 | |||||||||||
| Bd | Cont | By | Res | NS | EW | Butler | BAM | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| home | visit | |||||||
| 29 | 3NT | E | -1 | 100 | 89% | 1 | 1 | |
| 4♠ | E | -1 | 100 | 89% | ||||
| 30 | 6NT | E | +1 | 1020 | 77% | 2 | ||
| 4NT | E | +2 | 490 | 84% | ||||
| Σ | BAM Open | NS+0.2 | 1 | 3 | ||||
| BAM Closed | NS+1.5 | |||||||
| Player | Bds | Total | Avg |
|---|
LUPO VELOCE vs NEMESIS 2 : 2 VP (match 33144) PBN↑ top
⚠ line-ups not published by EBL for this match — board results only, no per-player Butler.
| Bd | Open room | Closed room | IMPs | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | LUPO VELOCE | NEMESIS | |
| 29 | 3NT | W | ♠K | +1 | 630 | 89% | 2♠ | E | ♦Q | +3 | 200 | 55% | 2 | |||
| 30 | 6NT | E | ♥3 | = | 990 | 52% | 7NT | E | ♠5 | = | 1520 | 97% | 2 | |||
| Σ | BAM / points | NS-0.8 | NS-1.0 | 2 | 2 | |||||||||||
| Bd | Cont | By | Res | NS | EW | Butler | BAM | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| home | visit | |||||||
| 29 | 3NT | W | +1 | 630 | 89% | 2 | ||
| 2♠ | E | +3 | 200 | 55% | ||||
| 30 | 6NT | E | = | 990 | 52% | 2 | ||
| 7NT | E | = | 1520 | 97% | ||||
| Σ | BAM Open | NS-0.8 | 2 | 2 | ||||
| BAM Closed | NS-1.0 | |||||||
| Player | Bds | Total | Avg |
|---|
GOVINDACHARI TEAM vs NONAME 1 : 3 VP (match 33145) PBN↑ top
⚠ line-ups not published by EBL for this match — board results only, no per-player Butler.
| Bd | Open room | Closed room | IMPs | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | GOVINDACHARI TEAM | NONAME | |
| 29 | 3NT | W | ♥6 | = | 600 | 69% | 3NT | E | ♦2 | -1 | 100 | 89% | 2 | |||
| 30 | 6NT | E | ♥6 | = | 990 | 52% | 6NT | E | ♦2 | = | 990 | 52% | 1 | 1 | ||
| Σ | BAM / points | NS-0.4 | NS+0.7 | 1 | 3 | |||||||||||
| Bd | Cont | By | Res | NS | EW | Butler | BAM | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| home | visit | |||||||
| 29 | 3NT | W | = | 600 | 69% | 2 | ||
| 3NT | E | -1 | 100 | 89% | ||||
| 30 | 6NT | E | = | 990 | 52% | 1 | 1 | |
| 6NT | E | = | 990 | 52% | ||||
| Σ | BAM Open | NS-0.4 | 1 | 3 | ||||
| BAM Closed | NS+0.7 | |||||||
| Player | Bds | Total | Avg |
|---|
BELL vs MORAN 2 : 2 VP (match 33146) PBN↑ top
⚠ line-ups not published by EBL for this match — board results only, no per-player Butler.
| Bd | Open room | Closed room | IMPs | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | BELL | MORAN | |
| 29 | 2♠ | E | ♦Q | +2 | 170 | 52% | 3NT | W | ♥7 | = | 600 | 69% | 2 | |||
| 30 | 7NT | E | ♥6 | = | 1520 | 97% | 6♦ | E | ♠5 | +1 | 940 | 68% | 2 | |||
| Σ | BAM / points | NS-0.9 | NS-0.0 | 2 | 2 | |||||||||||
| Bd | Cont | By | Res | NS | EW | Butler | BAM | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| home | visit | |||||||
| 29 | 2♠ | E | +2 | 170 | 52% | 2 | ||
| 3NT | W | = | 600 | 69% | ||||
| 30 | 7NT | E | = | 1520 | 97% | 2 | ||
| 6♦ | E | +1 | 940 | 68% | ||||
| Σ | BAM Open | NS-0.9 | 2 | 2 | ||||
| BAM Closed | NS-0.0 | |||||||
| Player | Bds | Total | Avg |
|---|
BYE vs SALAMA 0 : 2.4 VP (match 33147) PBN↑ top
⚠ line-ups not published by EBL for this match — board results only, no per-player Butler.
| Bd | Open room | Closed room | IMPs | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | BYE | SALAMA | |
| 29 | Pass | N | — | 0 | 0 | 69% | Pass | N | — | 0 | 0 | 69% | 1 | 1 | ||
| 30 | Pass | N | — | 0 | 0 | 92% | Pass | N | — | 0 | 0 | 92% | 1 | 1 | ||
| Σ | BAM / points | NS+1.2 | NS+1.2 | 2 | 2 | |||||||||||
| Bd | Cont | By | Res | NS | EW | Butler | BAM | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| home | visit | |||||||
| 29 | Pass | N | 0 | 0 | 69% | 1 | 1 | |
| Pass | N | 0 | 0 | 69% | ||||
| 30 | Pass | N | 0 | 0 | 92% | 1 | 1 | |
| Pass | N | 0 | 0 | 92% | ||||
| Σ | BAM Open | NS+1.2 | 2 | 2 | ||||
| BAM Closed | NS+1.2 | |||||||
| Player | Bds | Total | Avg |
|---|
NONAME TUR vs CHINA LADIES TEAM 0 : 4 VP (match 33148) PBN↑ top
⚠ line-ups not published by EBL for this match — board results only, no per-player Butler.
| Bd | Open room | Closed room | IMPs | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | NONAME TUR | CHINA LADIES TEAM | |
| 29 | 3NT | W | ♥3 | = | 600 | 69% | 3NT | W | ♦5 | -1 | 100 | 89% | 2 | |||
| 30 | 6NT | E | ♦3 | = | 990 | 52% | 4NT | W | ♠3 | +3 | 520 | 79% | 2 | |||
| Σ | BAM / points | NS-0.4 | NS+1.4 | 0 | 4 | |||||||||||
| Bd | Cont | By | Res | NS | EW | Butler | BAM | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| home | visit | |||||||
| 29 | 3NT | W | = | 600 | 69% | 2 | ||
| 3NT | W | -1 | 100 | 89% | ||||
| 30 | 6NT | E | = | 990 | 52% | 2 | ||
| 4NT | W | +3 | 520 | 79% | ||||
| Σ | BAM Open | NS-0.4 | 0 | 4 | ||||
| BAM Closed | NS+1.4 | |||||||
| Player | Bds | Total | Avg |
|---|
BRENO vs TALMAT 2 : 2 VP (match 33149) PBN↑ top
⚠ line-ups not published by EBL for this match — board results only, no per-player Butler.
| Bd | Open room | Closed room | IMPs | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | BRENO | TALMAT | |
| 29 | 3NT | E | ♠K | +1 | 630 | 89% | 3NT | W | ♦8 | -1 | 100 | 89% | 2 | |||
| 30 | 6NT | E | ♥3 | = | 990 | 52% | 7NT | E | ♠7 | = | 1520 | 97% | 2 | |||
| Σ | BAM / points | NS-0.8 | NS-0.2 | 2 | 2 | |||||||||||
| Bd | Cont | By | Res | NS | EW | Butler | BAM | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| home | visit | |||||||
| 29 | 3NT | E | +1 | 630 | 89% | 2 | ||
| 3NT | W | -1 | 100 | 89% | ||||
| 30 | 6NT | E | = | 990 | 52% | 2 | ||
| 7NT | E | = | 1520 | 97% | ||||
| Σ | BAM Open | NS-0.8 | 2 | 2 | ||||
| BAM Closed | NS-0.2 | |||||||
| Player | Bds | Total | Avg |
|---|
FORMIDABLES vs CUNEO 1 : 3 VP (match 33206) PBN↑ top
⚠ line-ups not published by EBL for this match — board results only, no per-player Butler.
| Bd | Open room | Closed room | IMPs | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | FORMIDABLES | CUNEO | |
| 29 | 1♠ | E | ♦Q | +3 | 170 | 52% | 1♠ | E | ♠5 | +3 | 170 | 52% | 1 | 1 | ||
| 30 | 7♦ | E | ♠3 | = | 1440 | 90% | 6NT | E | ♠3 | = | 990 | 52% | 2 | |||
| Σ | BAM / points | NS-0.8 | NS0.0 | 1 | 3 | |||||||||||
| Bd | Cont | By | Res | NS | EW | Butler | BAM | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| home | visit | |||||||
| 29 | 1♠ | E | +3 | 170 | 52% | 1 | 1 | |
| 1♠ | E | +3 | 170 | 52% | ||||
| 30 | 7♦ | E | = | 1440 | 90% | 2 | ||
| 6NT | E | = | 990 | 52% | ||||
| Σ | BAM Open | NS-0.8 | 1 | 3 | ||||
| BAM Closed | NS0.0 | |||||||
| Player | Bds | Total | Avg |
|---|
BLUE CHIP SWEDES vs HARRIS 4 : 0 VP (match 33207) PBN↑ top
⚠ line-ups not published by EBL for this match — board results only, no per-player Butler.
| Bd | Open room | Closed room | IMPs | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | BLUE CHIP SWEDES | HARRIS | |
| 29 | 3NT | E | ♦Q | = | 600 | 69% | 3NT | W | ♦6 | +2 | 660 | 98% | 2 | |||
| 30 | 3NT | E | ♠3 | +4 | 520 | 79% | 6♦ | E | ♠3 | +1 | 940 | 68% | 2 | |||
| Σ | BAM / points | NS+0.2 | NS-0.6 | 4 | 0 | |||||||||||
| Bd | Cont | By | Res | NS | EW | Butler | BAM | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| home | visit | |||||||
| 29 | 3NT | E | = | 600 | 69% | 2 | ||
| 3NT | W | +2 | 660 | 98% | ||||
| 30 | 3NT | E | +4 | 520 | 79% | 2 | ||
| 6♦ | E | +1 | 940 | 68% | ||||
| Σ | BAM Open | NS+0.2 | 4 | 0 | ||||
| BAM Closed | NS-0.6 | |||||||
| Player | Bds | Total | Avg |
|---|
MAROSAMITAWA vs MARILL 2 : 2 VP (match 33208) PBN↑ top
⚠ line-ups not published by EBL for this match — board results only, no per-player Butler.
| Bd | Open room | Closed room | IMPs | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | MAROSAMITAWA | MARILL | |
| 29 | 3NT | E | ♥3 | = | 600 | 69% | 2♠ | E | ♥Q | +1 | 140 | 60% | 2 | |||
| 30 | 6♦ | E | ♠3 | +1 | 940 | 68% | 6NT | E | ♠3 | +1 | 1020 | 77% | 2 | |||
| Σ | BAM / points | NS-0.0 | NS-0.4 | 2 | 2 | |||||||||||
| Bd | Cont | By | Res | NS | EW | Butler | BAM | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| home | visit | |||||||
| 29 | 3NT | E | = | 600 | 69% | 2 | ||
| 2♠ | E | +1 | 140 | 60% | ||||
| 30 | 6♦ | E | +1 | 940 | 68% | 2 | ||
| 6NT | E | +1 | 1020 | 77% | ||||
| Σ | BAM Open | NS-0.0 | 2 | 2 | ||||
| BAM Closed | NS-0.4 | |||||||
| Player | Bds | Total | Avg |
|---|
TESSIERES vs PAUNCZ 1 : 3 VP (match 33209) PBN↑ top
⚠ line-ups not published by EBL for this match — board results only, no per-player Butler.
| Bd | Open room | Closed room | IMPs | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | TESSIERES | PAUNCZ | |
| 29 | 3NT | E | ♠6 | -1 | 100 | 89% | 3NT | W | ♦6 | -1 | 100 | 89% | 1 | 1 | ||
| 30 | 6NT | E | ♥5 | +1 | 1020 | 77% | 6NT | E | ♠3 | = | 990 | 52% | 2 | |||
| Σ | BAM / points | NS+0.2 | NS+0.7 | 1 | 3 | |||||||||||
| Bd | Cont | By | Res | NS | EW | Butler | BAM | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| home | visit | |||||||
| 29 | 3NT | E | -1 | 100 | 89% | 1 | 1 | |
| 3NT | W | -1 | 100 | 89% | ||||
| 30 | 6NT | E | +1 | 1020 | 77% | 2 | ||
| 6NT | E | = | 990 | 52% | ||||
| Σ | BAM Open | NS+0.2 | 1 | 3 | ||||
| BAM Closed | NS+0.7 | |||||||
| Player | Bds | Total | Avg |
|---|
BYE vs ESTONIA 0 : 2.4 VP (match 33210) PBN↑ top
⚠ line-ups not published by EBL for this match — board results only, no per-player Butler.
| Bd | Open room | Closed room | IMPs | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | BYE | ESTONIA | |
| 29 | Pass | N | — | 0 | 0 | 69% | Pass | N | — | 0 | 0 | 69% | 1 | 1 | ||
| 30 | Pass | N | — | 0 | 0 | 92% | Pass | N | — | 0 | 0 | 92% | 1 | 1 | ||
| Σ | BAM / points | NS+1.2 | NS+1.2 | 2 | 2 | |||||||||||
| Bd | Cont | By | Res | NS | EW | Butler | BAM | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| home | visit | |||||||
| 29 | Pass | N | 0 | 0 | 69% | 1 | 1 | |
| Pass | N | 0 | 0 | 69% | ||||
| 30 | Pass | N | 0 | 0 | 92% | 1 | 1 | |
| Pass | N | 0 | 0 | 92% | ||||
| Σ | BAM Open | NS+1.2 | 2 | 2 | ||||
| BAM Closed | NS+1.2 | |||||||
| Player | Bds | Total | Avg |
|---|
BRUNET vs NEVER CLAIM 2 : 2 VP (match 33211) PBN↑ top
⚠ line-ups not published by EBL for this match — board results only, no per-player Butler.
| Bd | Open room | Closed room | IMPs | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | BRUNET | NEVER CLAIM | |
| 29 | 3NT | E | ♦6 | = | 600 | 69% | 3NT | W | ♣5 | = | 600 | 69% | 1 | 1 | ||
| 30 | 6NT | E | ♠5 | +1 | 1020 | 77% | 6NT | E | ♥6 | +1 | 1020 | 77% | 1 | 1 | ||
| Σ | BAM / points | NS-0.9 | NS-0.9 | 2 | 2 | |||||||||||
| Bd | Cont | By | Res | NS | EW | Butler | BAM | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| home | visit | |||||||
| 29 | 3NT | E | = | 600 | 69% | 1 | 1 | |
| 3NT | W | = | 600 | 69% | ||||
| 30 | 6NT | E | +1 | 1020 | 77% | 1 | 1 | |
| 6NT | E | +1 | 1020 | 77% | ||||
| Σ | BAM Open | NS-0.9 | 2 | 2 | ||||
| BAM Closed | NS-0.9 | |||||||
| Player | Bds | Total | Avg |
|---|
NETHERLANDS RED vs AJ DIAMENT 4 : 0 VP (match 33212) PBN↑ top
⚠ line-ups not published by EBL for this match — board results only, no per-player Butler.
| Bd | Open room | Closed room | IMPs | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | NETHERLANDS RED | AJ DIAMENT | |
| 29 | 3NT | W | ♦6 | -1 | 100 | 89% | 3NT | W | ♥7 | = | 600 | 69% | 2 | |||
| 30 | 6♣ | W | ♠10 | = | 920 | 74% | 6NT | E | ♠5 | +1 | 1020 | 77% | 2 | |||
| Σ | BAM / points | NS+1.3 | NS-0.9 | 4 | 0 | |||||||||||
| Bd | Cont | By | Res | NS | EW | Butler | BAM | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| home | visit | |||||||
| 29 | 3NT | W | -1 | 100 | 89% | 2 | ||
| 3NT | W | = | 600 | 69% | ||||
| 30 | 6♣ | W | = | 920 | 74% | 2 | ||
| 6NT | E | +1 | 1020 | 77% | ||||
| Σ | BAM Open | NS+1.3 | 4 | 0 | ||||
| BAM Closed | NS-0.9 | |||||||
| Player | Bds | Total | Avg |
|---|
PACIFIC vs POLAND 2 : 2 VP (match 33213) PBN↑ top
⚠ line-ups not published by EBL for this match — board results only, no per-player Butler.
| Bd | Open room | Closed room | IMPs | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | PACIFIC | POLAND | |
| 29 | 2♥ | W | ♠4 | +1 | 140 | 60% | 3NT | W | ♥7 | +1 | 630 | 89% | 2 | |||
| 30 | 6NT | E | ♥2 | +1 | 1020 | 77% | 7♣ | E | ♠6 | -1 | 50 | 100% | 2 | |||
| Σ | BAM / points | NS-0.4 | NS+0.2 | 2 | 2 | |||||||||||
| Bd | Cont | By | Res | NS | EW | Butler | BAM | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| home | visit | |||||||
| 29 | 2♥ | W | +1 | 140 | 60% | 2 | ||
| 3NT | W | +1 | 630 | 89% | ||||
| 30 | 6NT | E | +1 | 1020 | 77% | 2 | ||
| 7♣ | E | -1 | 50 | 100% | ||||
| Σ | BAM Open | NS-0.4 | 2 | 2 | ||||
| BAM Closed | NS+0.2 | |||||||
| Player | Bds | Total | Avg |
|---|