Round 11 — BAM TEAMS QUALIFICATION
16 matches. → cumulative standings · → board records
Round 11 results↑ top
Every match of the round — teams, board-a-match points and VPs. Click a table number or ‘protocol’ for the full board-by-board scorecard below.
| Table | Home team | Visiting team | BAM (home) | BAM (visit) | VP (home) | VP (visit) | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | BELL | FRANCE SENIORS | 1 | 3 | 1.00 | 3.00 | protocol → |
| 2 | BYE | DE KNIJFF | 2 | 2 | 0.00 | 2.40 | protocol → |
| 3 | NONAME TUR | NEMESIS | 4 | 0 | 4.00 | 0.00 | protocol → |
| 4 | BRENO | NONAME | 0 | 4 | 0.00 | 4.00 | protocol → |
| 5 | YOUNG SWEDES | MORAN | 3 | 1 | 3.00 | 1.00 | protocol → |
| 6 | LATVIA | SALAMA | 0 | 4 | 0.00 | 4.00 | protocol → |
| 7 | LUPO VELOCE | CHINA LADIES TEAM | 1 | 3 | 1.00 | 3.00 | protocol → |
| 8 | GOVINDACHARI TEAM | TALMAT | 2 | 2 | 2.00 | 2.00 | protocol → |
| 9 | BYE | CUNEO | 2 | 2 | 0.00 | 2.40 | protocol → |
| 10 | BRUNET | HARRIS | 4 | 0 | 4.00 | 0.00 | protocol → |
| 11 | NETHERLANDS RED | MARILL | 2 | 2 | 2.00 | 2.00 | protocol → |
| 12 | PACIFIC | PAUNCZ | 1 | 3 | 1.00 | 3.00 | protocol → |
| 13 | FORMIDABLES | ESTONIA | 1 | 3 | 1.00 | 3.00 | protocol → |
| 14 | BLUE CHIP SWEDES | NEVER CLAIM | 2 | 2 | 2.00 | 2.00 | protocol → |
| 15 | MAROSAMITAWA | AJ DIAMENT | 2 | 2 | 2.00 | 2.00 | protocol → |
| 16 | TESSIERES | POLAND | 2 | 2 | 2.00 | 2.00 | protocol → |
Standings after round 11↑ top
Cumulative board-a-match points through round 11 — the league table as it stood after this round. → full standings, every round & players
| Place | Team | Pts | R11 | Pld |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | CONNECTOR | 33.40 | · | 0 |
| 1 | DE BOTTON | 33.40 | · | 0 |
| 1 | DRACULA | 33.40 | · | 0 |
| 1 | EMERALD | 33.40 | · | 0 |
| 1 | FRANCE JUNIORS | 33.40 | · | 0 |
| 1 | MAHAFFEY | 33.40 | · | 0 |
| 1 | NETHERLANDS BLUE | 33.40 | · | 0 |
| 1 | VINCIGUERRA | 33.40 | · | 0 |
| 9 | NETHERLANDS RED | 29.40 | 2.00 | 11 |
| 10 | NONAME | 29.00 | 4.00 | 11 |
| 11 | YOUNG SWEDES | 28.40 | 3.00 | 11 |
| 12 | AJ DIAMENT | 26.40 | 2.00 | 11 |
| 12 | NONAME TUR | 26.40 | 4.00 | 11 |
| 14 | BRENO | 25.40 | 0.00 | 11 |
| 14 | POLAND | 25.40 | 2.00 | 11 |
| 14 | TESSIERES | 25.40 | 2.00 | 11 |
| 17 | BRUNET | 24.40 | 4.00 | 11 |
| 17 | DE KNIJFF | 24.40 | 2.40 | 11 |
| 17 | MAROSAMITAWA | 24.40 | 2.00 | 11 |
| 20 | MORAN | 24.00 | 1.00 | 11 |
| 20 | PAUNCZ | 24.00 | 3.00 | 11 |
| 22 | NEMESIS | 23.00 | 0.00 | 11 |
| 23 | NEVER CLAIM | 22.00 | 2.00 | 11 |
| 24 | BELL | 21.40 | 1.00 | 11 |
| 24 | FORMIDABLES | 21.40 | 1.00 | 11 |
| 24 | FRANCE SENIORS | 21.40 | 3.00 | 11 |
| 27 | ESTONIA | 21.00 | 3.00 | 11 |
| 27 | SALAMA | 21.00 | 4.00 | 11 |
| 29 | CUNEO | 20.40 | 2.40 | 11 |
| 29 | TALMAT | 20.40 | 2.00 | 11 |
| 31 | GOVINDACHARI TEAM | 19.40 | 2.00 | 11 |
| 31 | PACIFIC | 19.40 | 1.00 | 11 |
| 33 | LATVIA | 18.40 | 0.00 | 11 |
| 33 | LUPO VELOCE | 18.40 | 1.00 | 11 |
| 35 | BLUE CHIP SWEDES | 17.40 | 2.00 | 11 |
| 36 | CHINA LADIES TEAM | 17.00 | 3.00 | 11 |
| 37 | MARILL | 15.00 | 2.00 | 11 |
| 38 | HARRIS | 14.00 | 0.00 | 11 |
Board-a-match over this round's field — each pair's net boards won per board (2-0 win / 1-1 tie), shown as a board-a-match %.
Round 11 board-a-match standings↑ top
| Place | Player | Team | Boards | R11 | BAM% |
|---|
BELL vs FRANCE SENIORS 1 : 3 VP (match 33110) PBN↑ top
⚠ line-ups not published by EBL for this match — board results only, no per-player Butler.
| Bd | Open room | Closed room | IMPs | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | BELL | FRANCE SENIORS | |
| 21 | 6♣ | S | ♠Q | = | 1370 | 58% | 6♣ | S | ♥6 | = | 1370 | 58% | 1 | 1 | ||
| 22 | 2♠ | W | ♦J | +2 | 170 | 82% | 1NT | E | ♣J | = | 90 | 74% | 2 | |||
| Σ | BAM / points | NS-0.8 | NS+0.3 | 1 | 3 | |||||||||||
| Bd | Cont | By | Res | NS | EW | Butler | BAM | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| home | visit | |||||||
| 21 | 6♣ | S | = | 1370 | 58% | 1 | 1 | |
| 6♣ | S | = | 1370 | 58% | ||||
| 22 | 2♠ | W | +2 | 170 | 82% | 2 | ||
| 1NT | E | = | 90 | 74% | ||||
| Σ | BAM Open | NS-0.8 | 1 | 3 | ||||
| BAM Closed | NS+0.3 | |||||||
| Player | Bds | Total | Avg |
|---|
BYE vs DE KNIJFF 0 : 2.4 VP (match 33111) PBN↑ top
⚠ line-ups not published by EBL for this match — board results only, no per-player Butler.
| Bd | Open room | Closed room | IMPs | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | BYE | DE KNIJFF | |
| 21 | Pass | N | — | 0 | 0 | 92% | Pass | N | — | 0 | 0 | 92% | 1 | 1 | ||
| 22 | Pass | N | — | 0 | 0 | 86% | Pass | N | — | 0 | 0 | 86% | 1 | 1 | ||
| Σ | BAM / points | NS-0.1 | NS-0.1 | 2 | 2 | |||||||||||
| Bd | Cont | By | Res | NS | EW | Butler | BAM | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| home | visit | |||||||
| 21 | Pass | N | 0 | 0 | 92% | 1 | 1 | |
| Pass | N | 0 | 0 | 92% | ||||
| 22 | Pass | N | 0 | 0 | 86% | 1 | 1 | |
| Pass | N | 0 | 0 | 86% | ||||
| Σ | BAM Open | NS-0.1 | 2 | 2 | ||||
| BAM Closed | NS-0.1 | |||||||
| Player | Bds | Total | Avg |
|---|
NONAME TUR vs NEMESIS 4 : 0 VP (match 33112) PBN↑ top
⚠ line-ups not published by EBL for this match — board results only, no per-player Butler.
| Bd | Open room | Closed room | IMPs | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | NONAME TUR | NEMESIS | |
| 21 | 6♣ | S | ♠Q | = | 1370 | 58% | 3NT | N | ♣9 | +3 | 690 | 81% | 2 | |||
| 22 | 2♠ | E | ♦J | +1 | 140 | 52% | 2♠ | W | ♦J | +2 | 170 | 82% | 2 | |||
| Σ | BAM / points | NS-0.2 | NS-1.3 | 4 | 0 | |||||||||||
| Bd | Cont | By | Res | NS | EW | Butler | BAM | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| home | visit | |||||||
| 21 | 6♣ | S | = | 1370 | 58% | 2 | ||
| 3NT | N | +3 | 690 | 81% | ||||
| 22 | 2♠ | E | +1 | 140 | 52% | 2 | ||
| 2♠ | W | +2 | 170 | 82% | ||||
| Σ | BAM Open | NS-0.2 | 4 | 0 | ||||
| BAM Closed | NS-1.3 | |||||||
| Player | Bds | Total | Avg |
|---|
BRENO vs NONAME 0 : 4 VP (match 33113) PBN↑ top
⚠ line-ups not published by EBL for this match — board results only, no per-player Butler.
| Bd | Open room | Closed room | IMPs | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | BRENO | NONAME | |
| 21 | 5NT | S | ♥2 | +2 | 720 | 73% | 6NT | N | ♦2 | = | 1440 | 77% | 2 | |||
| 22 | 2♠ | W | ♥5 | +1 | 140 | 52% | 4♠ | E | ♦2 | -1 | 100 | 97% | 2 | |||
| Σ | BAM / points | NS-0.5 | NS+1.5 | 0 | 4 | |||||||||||
| Bd | Cont | By | Res | NS | EW | Butler | BAM | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| home | visit | |||||||
| 21 | 5NT | S | +2 | 720 | 73% | 2 | ||
| 6NT | N | = | 1440 | 77% | ||||
| 22 | 2♠ | W | +1 | 140 | 52% | 2 | ||
| 4♠ | E | -1 | 100 | 97% | ||||
| Σ | BAM Open | NS-0.5 | 0 | 4 | ||||
| BAM Closed | NS+1.5 | |||||||
| Player | Bds | Total | Avg |
|---|
YOUNG SWEDES vs MORAN 3 : 1 VP (match 33114) PBN↑ top
⚠ line-ups not published by EBL for this match — board results only, no per-player Butler.
| Bd | Open room | Closed room | IMPs | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | YOUNG SWEDES | MORAN | |
| 21 | 6NT | S | ♥6 | = | 1440 | 77% | 6NT | S | ♠5 | = | 1440 | 77% | 1 | 1 | ||
| 22 | 2♠ | E | ♠J | +1 | 140 | 52% | 4♠ | E | ♣J | = | 620 | 98% | 2 | |||
| Σ | BAM / points | NS+0.5 | NS-0.4 | 3 | 1 | |||||||||||
| Bd | Cont | By | Res | NS | EW | Butler | BAM | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| home | visit | |||||||
| 21 | 6NT | S | = | 1440 | 77% | 1 | 1 | |
| 6NT | S | = | 1440 | 77% | ||||
| 22 | 2♠ | E | +1 | 140 | 52% | 2 | ||
| 4♠ | E | = | 620 | 98% | ||||
| Σ | BAM Open | NS+0.5 | 3 | 1 | ||||
| BAM Closed | NS-0.4 | |||||||
| Player | Bds | Total | Avg |
|---|
LATVIA vs SALAMA 0 : 4 VP (match 33115) PBN↑ top
⚠ line-ups not published by EBL for this match — board results only, no per-player Butler.
| Bd | Open room | Closed room | IMPs | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | LATVIA | SALAMA | |
| 21 | 3♠x | E | ♣K | -5 | 1100 | 68% | 7♣ | N | ♠2 | = | 2140 | 95% | 2 | |||
| 22 | 2♠ | E | ♠J | +2 | 170 | 82% | 2♠ | E | ♣J | +1 | 140 | 52% | 2 | |||
| Σ | BAM / points | NS-1.0 | NS+0.9 | 0 | 4 | |||||||||||
| Bd | Cont | By | Res | NS | EW | Butler | BAM | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| home | visit | |||||||
| 21 | 3♠x | E | -5 | 1100 | 68% | 2 | ||
| 7♣ | N | = | 2140 | 95% | ||||
| 22 | 2♠ | E | +2 | 170 | 82% | 2 | ||
| 2♠ | E | +1 | 140 | 52% | ||||
| Σ | BAM Open | NS-1.0 | 0 | 4 | ||||
| BAM Closed | NS+0.9 | |||||||
| Player | Bds | Total | Avg |
|---|
LUPO VELOCE vs CHINA LADIES TEAM 1 : 3 VP (match 33116) PBN↑ top
⚠ line-ups not published by EBL for this match — board results only, no per-player Butler.
| Bd | Open room | Closed room | IMPs | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | LUPO VELOCE | CHINA LADIES TEAM | |
| 21 | 6♣ | N | ♥J | +1 | 1390 | 60% | 6♣ | N | ♣9 | +1 | 1390 | 60% | 1 | 1 | ||
| 22 | 2♠ | W | ♦J | +2 | 170 | 82% | 4♠ | W | ♣K | -1 | 100 | 97% | 2 | |||
| Σ | BAM / points | NS-0.5 | NS+1.1 | 1 | 3 | |||||||||||
| Bd | Cont | By | Res | NS | EW | Butler | BAM | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| home | visit | |||||||
| 21 | 6♣ | N | +1 | 1390 | 60% | 1 | 1 | |
| 6♣ | N | +1 | 1390 | 60% | ||||
| 22 | 2♠ | W | +2 | 170 | 82% | 2 | ||
| 4♠ | W | -1 | 100 | 97% | ||||
| Σ | BAM Open | NS-0.5 | 1 | 3 | ||||
| BAM Closed | NS+1.1 | |||||||
| Player | Bds | Total | Avg |
|---|
GOVINDACHARI TEAM vs TALMAT 2 : 2 VP (match 33117) PBN↑ top
⚠ line-ups not published by EBL for this match — board results only, no per-player Butler.
| Bd | Open room | Closed room | IMPs | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | GOVINDACHARI TEAM | TALMAT | |
| 21 | 6♣ | N | ♥6 | +1 | 1390 | 60% | 6NT | S | ♦5 | +1 | 1470 | 86% | 2 | |||
| 22 | 2♠ | E | ♥6 | +1 | 140 | 52% | 4♠ | W | ♣K | = | 620 | 98% | 2 | |||
| Σ | BAM / points | NS+0.2 | NS-0.3 | 2 | 2 | |||||||||||
| Bd | Cont | By | Res | NS | EW | Butler | BAM | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| home | visit | |||||||
| 21 | 6♣ | N | +1 | 1390 | 60% | 2 | ||
| 6NT | S | +1 | 1470 | 86% | ||||
| 22 | 2♠ | E | +1 | 140 | 52% | 2 | ||
| 4♠ | W | = | 620 | 98% | ||||
| Σ | BAM Open | NS+0.2 | 2 | 2 | ||||
| BAM Closed | NS-0.3 | |||||||
| Player | Bds | Total | Avg |
|---|
BYE vs CUNEO 0 : 2.4 VP (match 33174) PBN↑ top
⚠ line-ups not published by EBL for this match — board results only, no per-player Butler.
| Bd | Open room | Closed room | IMPs | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | BYE | CUNEO | |
| 21 | Pass | N | — | 0 | 0 | 92% | Pass | N | — | 0 | 0 | 92% | 1 | 1 | ||
| 22 | Pass | N | — | 0 | 0 | 86% | Pass | N | — | 0 | 0 | 86% | 1 | 1 | ||
| Σ | BAM / points | NS-0.1 | NS-0.1 | 2 | 2 | |||||||||||
| Bd | Cont | By | Res | NS | EW | Butler | BAM | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| home | visit | |||||||
| 21 | Pass | N | 0 | 0 | 92% | 1 | 1 | |
| Pass | N | 0 | 0 | 92% | ||||
| 22 | Pass | N | 0 | 0 | 86% | 1 | 1 | |
| Pass | N | 0 | 0 | 86% | ||||
| Σ | BAM Open | NS-0.1 | 2 | 2 | ||||
| BAM Closed | NS-0.1 | |||||||
| Player | Bds | Total | Avg |
|---|
BRUNET vs HARRIS 4 : 0 VP (match 33175) PBN↑ top
⚠ line-ups not published by EBL for this match — board results only, no per-player Butler.
| Bd | Open room | Closed room | IMPs | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | BRUNET | HARRIS | |
| 21 | 3NT | S | ♠Q | +4 | 720 | 73% | 6NT | N | ♥J | -1 | 100 | 100% | 2 | |||
| 22 | 1NT | E | ♣J | = | 90 | 74% | 2♠ | W | ♠J | +2 | 170 | 82% | 2 | |||
| Σ | BAM / points | NS+0.0 | NS-1.6 | 4 | 0 | |||||||||||
| Bd | Cont | By | Res | NS | EW | Butler | BAM | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| home | visit | |||||||
| 21 | 3NT | S | +4 | 720 | 73% | 2 | ||
| 6NT | N | -1 | 100 | 100% | ||||
| 22 | 1NT | E | = | 90 | 74% | 2 | ||
| 2♠ | W | +2 | 170 | 82% | ||||
| Σ | BAM Open | NS+0.0 | 4 | 0 | ||||
| BAM Closed | NS-1.6 | |||||||
| Player | Bds | Total | Avg |
|---|
NETHERLANDS RED vs MARILL 2 : 2 VP (match 33176) PBN↑ top
⚠ line-ups not published by EBL for this match — board results only, no per-player Butler.
| Bd | Open room | Closed room | IMPs | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | NETHERLANDS RED | MARILL | |
| 21 | 7♣ | S | ♣10 | = | 2140 | 95% | 6♣ | S | ♣2 | = | 1370 | 58% | 2 | |||
| 22 | 2♠ | W | ♦J | +1 | 140 | 52% | 1NT | E | ♣J | = | 90 | 74% | 2 | |||
| Σ | BAM / points | NS+0.9 | NS+0.3 | 2 | 2 | |||||||||||
| Bd | Cont | By | Res | NS | EW | Butler | BAM | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| home | visit | |||||||
| 21 | 7♣ | S | = | 2140 | 95% | 2 | ||
| 6♣ | S | = | 1370 | 58% | ||||
| 22 | 2♠ | W | +1 | 140 | 52% | 2 | ||
| 1NT | E | = | 90 | 74% | ||||
| Σ | BAM Open | NS+0.9 | 2 | 2 | ||||
| BAM Closed | NS+0.3 | |||||||
| Player | Bds | Total | Avg |
|---|
PACIFIC vs PAUNCZ 1 : 3 VP (match 33177) PBN↑ top
⚠ line-ups not published by EBL for this match — board results only, no per-player Butler.
| Bd | Open room | Closed room | IMPs | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | PACIFIC | PAUNCZ | |
| 21 | 6♣ | S | ♥6 | +1 | 1390 | 60% | 6♣ | N | ♠9 | +1 | 1390 | 60% | 1 | 1 | ||
| 22 | 2♠ | W | ♥2 | +2 | 170 | 82% | 2♠ | W | ♦J | +1 | 140 | 52% | 2 | |||
| Σ | BAM / points | NS-0.5 | NS+0.2 | 1 | 3 | |||||||||||
| Bd | Cont | By | Res | NS | EW | Butler | BAM | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| home | visit | |||||||
| 21 | 6♣ | S | +1 | 1390 | 60% | 1 | 1 | |
| 6♣ | N | +1 | 1390 | 60% | ||||
| 22 | 2♠ | W | +2 | 170 | 82% | 2 | ||
| 2♠ | W | +1 | 140 | 52% | ||||
| Σ | BAM Open | NS-0.5 | 1 | 3 | ||||
| BAM Closed | NS+0.2 | |||||||
| Player | Bds | Total | Avg |
|---|
FORMIDABLES vs ESTONIA 1 : 3 VP (match 33178) PBN↑ top
⚠ line-ups not published by EBL for this match — board results only, no per-player Butler.
| Bd | Open room | Closed room | IMPs | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | FORMIDABLES | ESTONIA | |
| 21 | 6♣ | S | ♥6 | +1 | 1390 | 60% | 3♠x | E | ♣K | -6 | 1400 | 71% | 2 | |||
| 22 | 2♠ | W | ♠J | +1 | 140 | 52% | 2♠ | W | ♦J | +1 | 140 | 52% | 1 | 1 | ||
| Σ | BAM / points | NS+0.2 | NS+0.4 | 1 | 3 | |||||||||||
| Bd | Cont | By | Res | NS | EW | Butler | BAM | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| home | visit | |||||||
| 21 | 6♣ | S | +1 | 1390 | 60% | 2 | ||
| 3♠x | E | -6 | 1400 | 71% | ||||
| 22 | 2♠ | W | +1 | 140 | 52% | 1 | 1 | |
| 2♠ | W | +1 | 140 | 52% | ||||
| Σ | BAM Open | NS+0.2 | 1 | 3 | ||||
| BAM Closed | NS+0.4 | |||||||
| Player | Bds | Total | Avg |
|---|
BLUE CHIP SWEDES vs NEVER CLAIM 2 : 2 VP (match 33179) PBN↑ top
⚠ line-ups not published by EBL for this match — board results only, no per-player Butler.
| Bd | Open room | Closed room | IMPs | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | BLUE CHIP SWEDES | NEVER CLAIM | |
| 21 | 3NT | S | ♠Q | +3 | 690 | 81% | 6♦ | N | ♠7 | = | 1370 | 58% | 2 | |||
| 22 | 3♠ | W | ♦A | = | 140 | 52% | 3♣x | S | ♣3 | -3 | 500 | 94% | 2 | |||
| Σ | BAM / points | NS-0.6 | NS-1.0 | 2 | 2 | |||||||||||
| Bd | Cont | By | Res | NS | EW | Butler | BAM | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| home | visit | |||||||
| 21 | 3NT | S | +3 | 690 | 81% | 2 | ||
| 6♦ | N | = | 1370 | 58% | ||||
| 22 | 3♠ | W | = | 140 | 52% | 2 | ||
| 3♣x | S | -3 | 500 | 94% | ||||
| Σ | BAM Open | NS-0.6 | 2 | 2 | ||||
| BAM Closed | NS-1.0 | |||||||
| Player | Bds | Total | Avg |
|---|
MAROSAMITAWA vs AJ DIAMENT 2 : 2 VP (match 33180) PBN↑ top
⚠ line-ups not published by EBL for this match — board results only, no per-player Butler.
| Bd | Open room | Closed room | IMPs | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | MAROSAMITAWA | AJ DIAMENT | |
| 21 | 3NT | N | ♠Q | +3 | 690 | 81% | 6NT | N | ♣9 | +1 | 1470 | 86% | 2 | |||
| 22 | 4♠ | E | ♦3 | -1 | 100 | 97% | 2♠ | E | ♣J | +1 | 140 | 52% | 2 | |||
| Σ | BAM / points | NS+0.3 | NS+0.7 | 2 | 2 | |||||||||||
| Bd | Cont | By | Res | NS | EW | Butler | BAM | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| home | visit | |||||||
| 21 | 3NT | N | +3 | 690 | 81% | 2 | ||
| 6NT | N | +1 | 1470 | 86% | ||||
| 22 | 4♠ | E | -1 | 100 | 97% | 2 | ||
| 2♠ | E | +1 | 140 | 52% | ||||
| Σ | BAM Open | NS+0.3 | 2 | 2 | ||||
| BAM Closed | NS+0.7 | |||||||
| Player | Bds | Total | Avg |
|---|
TESSIERES vs POLAND 2 : 2 VP (match 33181) PBN↑ top
⚠ line-ups not published by EBL for this match — board results only, no per-player Butler.
| Bd | Open room | Closed room | IMPs | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | TESSIERES | POLAND | |
| 21 | 7♣ | S | ♦5 | = | 2140 | 95% | 7♣ | N | ♠5 | = | 2140 | 95% | 1 | 1 | ||
| 22 | 2♠ | W | ♣K | +1 | 140 | 52% | 2♠ | W | ♦J | +1 | 140 | 52% | 1 | 1 | ||
| Σ | BAM / points | NS+0.9 | NS+0.9 | 2 | 2 | |||||||||||
| Bd | Cont | By | Res | NS | EW | Butler | BAM | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| home | visit | |||||||
| 21 | 7♣ | S | = | 2140 | 95% | 1 | 1 | |
| 7♣ | N | = | 2140 | 95% | ||||
| 22 | 2♠ | W | +1 | 140 | 52% | 1 | 1 | |
| 2♠ | W | +1 | 140 | 52% | ||||
| Σ | BAM Open | NS+0.9 | 2 | 2 | ||||
| BAM Closed | NS+0.9 | |||||||
| Player | Bds | Total | Avg |
|---|