Round 1 — BAM TEAMS QUALIFICATION
16 matches. → cumulative standings · → board records
Round 1 results↑ top
Every match of the round — teams, board-a-match points and VPs. Click a table number or ‘protocol’ for the full board-by-board scorecard below.
| Table | Home team | Visiting team | BAM (home) | BAM (visit) | VP (home) | VP (visit) | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | CUNEO | FRANCE SENIORS | 1 | 3 | 1.00 | 3.00 | protocol → |
| 2 | HARRIS | DE KNIJFF | 0 | 4 | 0.00 | 4.00 | protocol → |
| 3 | MARILL | NEMESIS | 1 | 3 | 1.00 | 3.00 | protocol → |
| 4 | PAUNCZ | NONAME | 1 | 3 | 1.00 | 3.00 | protocol → |
| 5 | ESTONIA | MORAN | 1 | 3 | 1.00 | 3.00 | protocol → |
| 6 | NEVER CLAIM | SALAMA | 3 | 1 | 3.00 | 1.00 | protocol → |
| 7 | AJ DIAMENT | CHINA LADIES TEAM | 3 | 1 | 3.00 | 1.00 | protocol → |
| 8 | POLAND | TALMAT | 4 | 0 | 4.00 | 0.00 | protocol → |
| 9 | NETHERLANDS RED | NONAME TUR | 3 | 1 | 3.00 | 1.00 | protocol → |
| 10 | PACIFIC | BRENO | 2 | 2 | 2.00 | 2.00 | protocol → |
| 11 | FORMIDABLES | YOUNG SWEDES | 3 | 1 | 3.00 | 1.00 | protocol → |
| 12 | BLUE CHIP SWEDES | LATVIA | 4 | 0 | 4.00 | 0.00 | protocol → |
| 13 | MAROSAMITAWA | LUPO VELOCE | 1 | 3 | 1.00 | 3.00 | protocol → |
| 14 | TESSIERES | GOVINDACHARI TEAM | 3 | 1 | 3.00 | 1.00 | protocol → |
| 15 | BYE | BELL | 2 | 2 | 0.00 | 2.40 | protocol → |
| 16 | BRUNET | BYE | 2 | 2 | 2.40 | 0.00 | protocol → |
Standings after round 1↑ top
Cumulative board-a-match points through round 1 — the league table as it stood after this round. → full standings, every round & players
| Place | Team | Pts | R1 | Pld |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | CONNECTOR | 33.40 | · | 0 |
| 1 | DE BOTTON | 33.40 | · | 0 |
| 1 | DRACULA | 33.40 | · | 0 |
| 1 | EMERALD | 33.40 | · | 0 |
| 1 | FRANCE JUNIORS | 33.40 | · | 0 |
| 1 | MAHAFFEY | 33.40 | · | 0 |
| 1 | NETHERLANDS BLUE | 33.40 | · | 0 |
| 1 | VINCIGUERRA | 33.40 | · | 0 |
| 9 | BLUE CHIP SWEDES | 4.00 | 4.00 | 1 |
| 9 | DE KNIJFF | 4.00 | 4.00 | 1 |
| 9 | POLAND | 4.00 | 4.00 | 1 |
| 12 | AJ DIAMENT | 3.00 | 3.00 | 1 |
| 12 | FORMIDABLES | 3.00 | 3.00 | 1 |
| 12 | FRANCE SENIORS | 3.00 | 3.00 | 1 |
| 12 | LUPO VELOCE | 3.00 | 3.00 | 1 |
| 12 | MORAN | 3.00 | 3.00 | 1 |
| 12 | NEMESIS | 3.00 | 3.00 | 1 |
| 12 | NETHERLANDS RED | 3.00 | 3.00 | 1 |
| 12 | NEVER CLAIM | 3.00 | 3.00 | 1 |
| 12 | NONAME | 3.00 | 3.00 | 1 |
| 12 | TESSIERES | 3.00 | 3.00 | 1 |
| 22 | BELL | 2.40 | 2.40 | 1 |
| 22 | BRUNET | 2.40 | 2.40 | 1 |
| 24 | BRENO | 2.00 | 2.00 | 1 |
| 24 | PACIFIC | 2.00 | 2.00 | 1 |
| 26 | CHINA LADIES TEAM | 1.00 | 1.00 | 1 |
| 26 | CUNEO | 1.00 | 1.00 | 1 |
| 26 | ESTONIA | 1.00 | 1.00 | 1 |
| 26 | GOVINDACHARI TEAM | 1.00 | 1.00 | 1 |
| 26 | MARILL | 1.00 | 1.00 | 1 |
| 26 | MAROSAMITAWA | 1.00 | 1.00 | 1 |
| 26 | NONAME TUR | 1.00 | 1.00 | 1 |
| 26 | PAUNCZ | 1.00 | 1.00 | 1 |
| 26 | SALAMA | 1.00 | 1.00 | 1 |
| 26 | YOUNG SWEDES | 1.00 | 1.00 | 1 |
| 36 | HARRIS | 0.00 | 0.00 | 1 |
| 36 | LATVIA | 0.00 | 0.00 | 1 |
| 36 | TALMAT | 0.00 | 0.00 | 1 |
Board-a-match over this round's field — each pair's net boards won per board (2-0 win / 1-1 tie), shown as a board-a-match %.
Round 1 board-a-match standings↑ top
| Place | Player | Team | Boards | R1 | BAM% |
|---|
CUNEO vs FRANCE SENIORS 1 : 3 VP (match 32966) PBN↑ top
⚠ line-ups not published by EBL for this match — board results only, no per-player Butler.
| Bd | Open room | Closed room | IMPs | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | CUNEO | FRANCE SENIORS | |
| 1 | 4♦ | E | ♠K | = | 130 | 76% | 4♠ | S | ♦K | -1 | 50 | 53% | 2 | |||
| 2 | 4♠ | W | ♦A | +1 | 450 | 63% | 4♠ | W | ♦A | +1 | 450 | 63% | 1 | 1 | ||
| Σ | BAM / points | NS-0.8 | NS-0.2 | 1 | 3 | |||||||||||
| Bd | Cont | By | Res | NS | EW | Butler | BAM | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| home | visit | |||||||
| 1 | 4♦ | E | = | 130 | 76% | 2 | ||
| 4♠ | S | -1 | 50 | 53% | ||||
| 2 | 4♠ | W | +1 | 450 | 63% | 1 | 1 | |
| 4♠ | W | +1 | 450 | 63% | ||||
| Σ | BAM Open | NS-0.8 | 1 | 3 | ||||
| BAM Closed | NS-0.2 | |||||||
| Player | Bds | Total | Avg |
|---|
HARRIS vs DE KNIJFF 0 : 4 VP (match 32967) PBN↑ top
⚠ line-ups not published by EBL for this match — board results only, no per-player Butler.
| Bd | Open room | Closed room | IMPs | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | HARRIS | DE KNIJFF | |
| 1 | 3NT | E | ♠K | +1 | 430 | 94% | 4♠ | N | ♦K | -1 | 50 | 53% | 2 | |||
| 2 | 4♠ | E | ♥7 | +1 | 450 | 63% | 3NT | E | ♣3 | +1 | 430 | 74% | 2 | |||
| Σ | BAM / points | NS-1.1 | NS+0.5 | 0 | 4 | |||||||||||
| Bd | Cont | By | Res | NS | EW | Butler | BAM | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| home | visit | |||||||
| 1 | 3NT | E | +1 | 430 | 94% | 2 | ||
| 4♠ | N | -1 | 50 | 53% | ||||
| 2 | 4♠ | E | +1 | 450 | 63% | 2 | ||
| 3NT | E | +1 | 430 | 74% | ||||
| Σ | BAM Open | NS-1.1 | 0 | 4 | ||||
| BAM Closed | NS+0.5 | |||||||
| Player | Bds | Total | Avg |
|---|
MARILL vs NEMESIS 1 : 3 VP (match 32968) PBN↑ top
⚠ line-ups not published by EBL for this match — board results only, no per-player Butler.
| Bd | Open room | Closed room | IMPs | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | MARILL | NEMESIS | |
| 1 | 4♠ | S | ♦K | -1 | 50 | 53% | 5♦ | E | ♣J | -1 | 50 | 86% | 2 | |||
| 2 | 4♠ | W | ♦A | +1 | 450 | 63% | 4♠ | W | ♦A | +1 | 450 | 63% | 1 | 1 | ||
| Σ | BAM / points | NS-0.2 | NS+0.5 | 1 | 3 | |||||||||||
| Bd | Cont | By | Res | NS | EW | Butler | BAM | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| home | visit | |||||||
| 1 | 4♠ | S | -1 | 50 | 53% | 2 | ||
| 5♦ | E | -1 | 50 | 86% | ||||
| 2 | 4♠ | W | +1 | 450 | 63% | 1 | 1 | |
| 4♠ | W | +1 | 450 | 63% | ||||
| Σ | BAM Open | NS-0.2 | 1 | 3 | ||||
| BAM Closed | NS+0.5 | |||||||
| Player | Bds | Total | Avg |
|---|
PAUNCZ vs NONAME 1 : 3 VP (match 32969) PBN↑ top
⚠ line-ups not published by EBL for this match — board results only, no per-player Butler.
| Bd | Open room | Closed room | IMPs | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | PAUNCZ | NONAME | |
| 1 | 4♠x | S | ♦K | -2 | 300 | 86% | 4♦ | E | ♠K | = | 130 | 76% | 2 | |||
| 2 | 4♠ | W | ♦A | +1 | 450 | 63% | 4♠ | W | ♦K | +1 | 450 | 63% | 1 | 1 | ||
| Σ | BAM / points | NS-1.0 | NS-0.8 | 1 | 3 | |||||||||||
| Bd | Cont | By | Res | NS | EW | Butler | BAM | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| home | visit | |||||||
| 1 | 4♠x | S | -2 | 300 | 86% | 2 | ||
| 4♦ | E | = | 130 | 76% | ||||
| 2 | 4♠ | W | +1 | 450 | 63% | 1 | 1 | |
| 4♠ | W | +1 | 450 | 63% | ||||
| Σ | BAM Open | NS-1.0 | 1 | 3 | ||||
| BAM Closed | NS-0.8 | |||||||
| Player | Bds | Total | Avg |
|---|
ESTONIA vs MORAN 1 : 3 VP (match 32970) PBN↑ top
⚠ line-ups not published by EBL for this match — board results only, no per-player Butler.
| Bd | Open room | Closed room | IMPs | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | ESTONIA | MORAN | |
| 1 | 5♦ | E | ♠K | -2 | 100 | 95% | 5♦x | E | ♠K | -1 | 100 | 95% | 1 | 1 | ||
| 2 | 4♠ | W | ♦K | +1 | 450 | 63% | 4♠ | W | ♦A | = | 420 | 79% | 2 | |||
| Σ | BAM / points | NS+0.6 | NS+1.5 | 1 | 3 | |||||||||||
| Bd | Cont | By | Res | NS | EW | Butler | BAM | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| home | visit | |||||||
| 1 | 5♦ | E | -2 | 100 | 95% | 1 | 1 | |
| 5♦x | E | -1 | 100 | 95% | ||||
| 2 | 4♠ | W | +1 | 450 | 63% | 2 | ||
| 4♠ | W | = | 420 | 79% | ||||
| Σ | BAM Open | NS+0.6 | 1 | 3 | ||||
| BAM Closed | NS+1.5 | |||||||
| Player | Bds | Total | Avg |
|---|
NEVER CLAIM vs SALAMA 3 : 1 VP (match 32971) PBN↑ top
⚠ line-ups not published by EBL for this match — board results only, no per-player Butler.
| Bd | Open room | Closed room | IMPs | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | NEVER CLAIM | SALAMA | |
| 1 | 5♦ | W | ♣J | -1 | 50 | 86% | 4♠ | S | ♦K | -1 | 50 | 53% | 2 | |||
| 2 | 4♠ | W | ♦A | +1 | 450 | 63% | 4♠ | W | ♣J | +1 | 450 | 63% | 1 | 1 | ||
| Σ | BAM / points | NS+0.5 | NS-0.2 | 3 | 1 | |||||||||||
| Bd | Cont | By | Res | NS | EW | Butler | BAM | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| home | visit | |||||||
| 1 | 5♦ | W | -1 | 50 | 86% | 2 | ||
| 4♠ | S | -1 | 50 | 53% | ||||
| 2 | 4♠ | W | +1 | 450 | 63% | 1 | 1 | |
| 4♠ | W | +1 | 450 | 63% | ||||
| Σ | BAM Open | NS+0.5 | 3 | 1 | ||||
| BAM Closed | NS-0.2 | |||||||
| Player | Bds | Total | Avg |
|---|
AJ DIAMENT vs CHINA LADIES TEAM 3 : 1 VP (match 32972) PBN↑ top
⚠ line-ups not published by EBL for this match — board results only, no per-player Butler.
| Bd | Open room | Closed room | IMPs | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | AJ DIAMENT | CHINA LADIES TEAM | |
| 1 | 4♠ | S | ♦K | -1 | 50 | 53% | 4♠x | S | ♦K | -2 | 300 | 86% | 2 | |||
| 2 | 4♠ | W | ♣J | +1 | 450 | 63% | 4♠ | W | ♦A | +1 | 450 | 63% | 1 | 1 | ||
| Σ | BAM / points | NS-0.2 | NS-1.0 | 3 | 1 | |||||||||||
| Bd | Cont | By | Res | NS | EW | Butler | BAM | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| home | visit | |||||||
| 1 | 4♠ | S | -1 | 50 | 53% | 2 | ||
| 4♠x | S | -2 | 300 | 86% | ||||
| 2 | 4♠ | W | +1 | 450 | 63% | 1 | 1 | |
| 4♠ | W | +1 | 450 | 63% | ||||
| Σ | BAM Open | NS-0.2 | 3 | 1 | ||||
| BAM Closed | NS-1.0 | |||||||
| Player | Bds | Total | Avg |
|---|
POLAND vs TALMAT 4 : 0 VP (match 32973) PBN↑ top
⚠ line-ups not published by EBL for this match — board results only, no per-player Butler.
| Bd | Open room | Closed room | IMPs | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | POLAND | TALMAT | |
| 1 | 4♠ | N | ♦K | -1 | 50 | 53% | 4♠ | S | ♦K | -2 | 100 | 66% | 2 | |||
| 2 | 4♠ | E | ♦A | -1 | 50 | 100% | 4♠ | W | ♦A | +1 | 450 | 63% | 2 | |||
| Σ | BAM / points | NS+1.1 | NS-0.6 | 4 | 0 | |||||||||||
| Bd | Cont | By | Res | NS | EW | Butler | BAM | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| home | visit | |||||||
| 1 | 4♠ | N | -1 | 50 | 53% | 2 | ||
| 4♠ | S | -2 | 100 | 66% | ||||
| 2 | 4♠ | E | -1 | 50 | 100% | 2 | ||
| 4♠ | W | +1 | 450 | 63% | ||||
| Σ | BAM Open | NS+1.1 | 4 | 0 | ||||
| BAM Closed | NS-0.6 | |||||||
| Player | Bds | Total | Avg |
|---|
NETHERLANDS RED vs NONAME TUR 3 : 1 VP (match 33030) PBN↑ top
⚠ line-ups not published by EBL for this match — board results only, no per-player Butler.
| Bd | Open room | Closed room | IMPs | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | NETHERLANDS RED | NONAME TUR | |
| 1 | 4♠ | S | ♦K | -2 | 100 | 66% | 4♠ | S | ♦K | -2 | 100 | 66% | 1 | 1 | ||
| 2 | 4♠ | W | ♦K | +1 | 450 | 63% | 4♠ | E | ♦A | +2 | 480 | 100% | 2 | |||
| Σ | BAM / points | NS-0.6 | NS-1.3 | 3 | 1 | |||||||||||
| Bd | Cont | By | Res | NS | EW | Butler | BAM | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| home | visit | |||||||
| 1 | 4♠ | S | -2 | 100 | 66% | 1 | 1 | |
| 4♠ | S | -2 | 100 | 66% | ||||
| 2 | 4♠ | W | +1 | 450 | 63% | 2 | ||
| 4♠ | E | +2 | 480 | 100% | ||||
| Σ | BAM Open | NS-0.6 | 3 | 1 | ||||
| BAM Closed | NS-1.3 | |||||||
| Player | Bds | Total | Avg |
|---|
PACIFIC vs BRENO 2 : 2 VP (match 33031) PBN↑ top
⚠ line-ups not published by EBL for this match — board results only, no per-player Butler.
| Bd | Open room | Closed room | IMPs | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | PACIFIC | BRENO | |
| 1 | 3♠ | S | ♦K | -1 | 50 | 53% | 4♠x | S | ♦K | -2 | 300 | 86% | 2 | |||
| 2 | 4♠ | W | ♦A | +1 | 450 | 63% | 4♠ | W | ♣J | = | 420 | 79% | 2 | |||
| Σ | BAM / points | NS-0.2 | NS-0.1 | 2 | 2 | |||||||||||
| Bd | Cont | By | Res | NS | EW | Butler | BAM | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| home | visit | |||||||
| 1 | 3♠ | S | -1 | 50 | 53% | 2 | ||
| 4♠x | S | -2 | 300 | 86% | ||||
| 2 | 4♠ | W | +1 | 450 | 63% | 2 | ||
| 4♠ | W | = | 420 | 79% | ||||
| Σ | BAM Open | NS-0.2 | 2 | 2 | ||||
| BAM Closed | NS-0.1 | |||||||
| Player | Bds | Total | Avg |
|---|
FORMIDABLES vs YOUNG SWEDES 3 : 1 VP (match 33032) PBN↑ top
⚠ line-ups not published by EBL for this match — board results only, no per-player Butler.
| Bd | Open room | Closed room | IMPs | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | FORMIDABLES | YOUNG SWEDES | |
| 1 | 4♠x | S | ♥3 | -1 | 100 | 66% | 5♠x | S | ♦K | -3 | 500 | 98% | 2 | |||
| 2 | 4♠ | E | ♥3 | +1 | 450 | 63% | 4♠ | W | ♦A | +1 | 450 | 63% | 1 | 1 | ||
| Σ | BAM / points | NS-0.6 | NS-1.2 | 3 | 1 | |||||||||||
| Bd | Cont | By | Res | NS | EW | Butler | BAM | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| home | visit | |||||||
| 1 | 4♠x | S | -1 | 100 | 66% | 2 | ||
| 5♠x | S | -3 | 500 | 98% | ||||
| 2 | 4♠ | E | +1 | 450 | 63% | 1 | 1 | |
| 4♠ | W | +1 | 450 | 63% | ||||
| Σ | BAM Open | NS-0.6 | 3 | 1 | ||||
| BAM Closed | NS-1.2 | |||||||
| Player | Bds | Total | Avg |
|---|
BLUE CHIP SWEDES vs LATVIA 4 : 0 VP (match 33033) PBN↑ top
⚠ line-ups not published by EBL for this match — board results only, no per-player Butler.
| Bd | Open room | Closed room | IMPs | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | BLUE CHIP SWEDES | LATVIA | |
| 1 | 4♠ | S | ♦K | -1 | 50 | 53% | 5♠x | S | ♦K | -3 | 500 | 98% | 2 | |||
| 2 | 3NT | W | ♥2 | = | 400 | 84% | 4♠ | W | ♦A | +1 | 450 | 63% | 2 | |||
| Σ | BAM / points | NS+0.7 | NS-1.2 | 4 | 0 | |||||||||||
| Bd | Cont | By | Res | NS | EW | Butler | BAM | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| home | visit | |||||||
| 1 | 4♠ | S | -1 | 50 | 53% | 2 | ||
| 5♠x | S | -3 | 500 | 98% | ||||
| 2 | 3NT | W | = | 400 | 84% | 2 | ||
| 4♠ | W | +1 | 450 | 63% | ||||
| Σ | BAM Open | NS+0.7 | 4 | 0 | ||||
| BAM Closed | NS-1.2 | |||||||
| Player | Bds | Total | Avg |
|---|
MAROSAMITAWA vs LUPO VELOCE 1 : 3 VP (match 33034) PBN↑ top
⚠ line-ups not published by EBL for this match — board results only, no per-player Butler.
| Bd | Open room | Closed room | IMPs | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | MAROSAMITAWA | LUPO VELOCE | |
| 1 | 5♦ | W | ♠3 | -1 | 50 | 86% | 4♠ | S | ♦K | = | 420 | 100% | 2 | |||
| 2 | 4♠ | W | ♦A | +1 | 450 | 63% | 4♠ | W | ♦A | +1 | 450 | 63% | 1 | 1 | ||
| Σ | BAM / points | NS+0.5 | NS+0.7 | 1 | 3 | |||||||||||
| Bd | Cont | By | Res | NS | EW | Butler | BAM | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| home | visit | |||||||
| 1 | 5♦ | W | -1 | 50 | 86% | 2 | ||
| 4♠ | S | = | 420 | 100% | ||||
| 2 | 4♠ | W | +1 | 450 | 63% | 1 | 1 | |
| 4♠ | W | +1 | 450 | 63% | ||||
| Σ | BAM Open | NS+0.5 | 1 | 3 | ||||
| BAM Closed | NS+0.7 | |||||||
| Player | Bds | Total | Avg |
|---|
TESSIERES vs GOVINDACHARI TEAM 3 : 1 VP (match 33035) PBN↑ top
⚠ line-ups not published by EBL for this match — board results only, no per-player Butler.
| Bd | Open room | Closed room | IMPs | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | TESSIERES | GOVINDACHARI TEAM | |
| 1 | 5♦ | E | ♠K | -1 | 50 | 86% | 4♠x | S | ♦8 | -2 | 300 | 86% | 2 | |||
| 2 | 4♠ | W | ♦A | +1 | 450 | 63% | 4♠ | W | ♦A | +1 | 450 | 63% | 1 | 1 | ||
| Σ | BAM / points | NS+0.5 | NS-1.0 | 3 | 1 | |||||||||||
| Bd | Cont | By | Res | NS | EW | Butler | BAM | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| home | visit | |||||||
| 1 | 5♦ | E | -1 | 50 | 86% | 2 | ||
| 4♠x | S | -2 | 300 | 86% | ||||
| 2 | 4♠ | W | +1 | 450 | 63% | 1 | 1 | |
| 4♠ | W | +1 | 450 | 63% | ||||
| Σ | BAM Open | NS+0.5 | 3 | 1 | ||||
| BAM Closed | NS-1.0 | |||||||
| Player | Bds | Total | Avg |
|---|
BYE vs BELL 0 : 2.4 VP (match 33036) PBN↑ top
⚠ line-ups not published by EBL for this match — board results only, no per-player Butler.
| Bd | Open room | Closed room | IMPs | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | BYE | BELL | |
| 1 | Pass | N | — | 0 | 0 | 73% | Pass | N | — | 0 | 0 | 73% | 1 | 1 | ||
| 2 | Pass | N | — | 0 | 0 | 92% | Pass | N | — | 0 | 0 | 92% | 1 | 1 | ||
| Σ | BAM / points | NS+1.3 | NS+1.3 | 2 | 2 | |||||||||||
| Bd | Cont | By | Res | NS | EW | Butler | BAM | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| home | visit | |||||||
| 1 | Pass | N | 0 | 0 | 73% | 1 | 1 | |
| Pass | N | 0 | 0 | 73% | ||||
| 2 | Pass | N | 0 | 0 | 92% | 1 | 1 | |
| Pass | N | 0 | 0 | 92% | ||||
| Σ | BAM Open | NS+1.3 | 2 | 2 | ||||
| BAM Closed | NS+1.3 | |||||||
| Player | Bds | Total | Avg |
|---|
BRUNET vs BYE 2.4 : 0 VP (match 33037) PBN↑ top
⚠ line-ups not published by EBL for this match — board results only, no per-player Butler.
| Bd | Open room | Closed room | IMPs | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | BRUNET | BYE | |
| 1 | Pass | N | — | 0 | 0 | 73% | Pass | N | — | 0 | 0 | 73% | 1 | 1 | ||
| 2 | Pass | N | — | 0 | 0 | 92% | Pass | N | — | 0 | 0 | 92% | 1 | 1 | ||
| Σ | BAM / points | NS+1.3 | NS+1.3 | 2 | 2 | |||||||||||
| Bd | Cont | By | Res | NS | EW | Butler | BAM | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| home | visit | |||||||
| 1 | Pass | N | 0 | 0 | 73% | 1 | 1 | |
| Pass | N | 0 | 0 | 73% | ||||
| 2 | Pass | N | 0 | 0 | 92% | 1 | 1 | |
| Pass | N | 0 | 0 | 92% | ||||
| Σ | BAM Open | NS+1.3 | 2 | 2 | ||||
| BAM Closed | NS+1.3 | |||||||
| Player | Bds | Total | Avg |
|---|