Arye KRAVITZ · ISRAEL DIAMONDS
vs par split: bidding -1.70 · play +0.30
Strength of schedule: opponents averaged +0.28/bd (a tough draw) → opponent-adjusted -1.88/bd
Card play — on target: opening leads 40.0% · declarer play 100.0% · defence 100.0%
Bidding activity — not a pass: 29.6% (8/27)
| vs NT | vs a suit | |
|---|---|---|
| Opening leads | 25.0% (4) | 100.0% (1) |
| Declarer play | · | 100.0% (1) |
| Defence | 100.0% (4) | 100.0% (3) |
Opening leads by suit led: ♠ 50.0% (2) · ♥ 100.0% (1) · ♦ 0.0% (1) · ♣ 0.0% (1)
vs par by strain: NT -3.80 (5) · a suit +1.00 (5)
vs par by level: part-score +0.50 (6) · game -4.25 (4)
By role: declaring +0.23/bd (-1.00 vs par · 3) · defending -3.19/bd (-1.57 vs par · 7)
By vulnerability: vulnerable -1.52/bd (-1.20 vs par · 5) · not vulnerable -2.80/bd (-1.60 vs par · 5)
By round↑ top
| Round | Partner | Opponents | Room | Bds | Butler | Avg | vs par |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Round 3 | Sara BRAUDO | Michael GROMOELLER – Juanita OCHOA | Open | 10 | -21.6 | -2.16 | -1.40 |
Every board — best Butler first↑ top
vs par = IMPs this pair scored above (+) or below (−) the board’s double-dummy par — what bidding and play (theirs and the opponents’) added or gave away against perfect play.
| Butler | Round | Opponents | Bd | Contract | Lead | Res | vs par |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| +3.3 | Round 3 | FORCING PROBABLY | 22 | 3♠ | ♦T | = | +1 |
| +1.6 | Round 3 | FORCING PROBABLY | 23 | 1NT | ♣Q | = | -2 |
| +0.4 | Round 3 | FORCING PROBABLY | 25 | 3♠ | ♣9 | -1 | +5 |
| -0.4 | Round 3 | FORCING PROBABLY | 24 | 4♠ | ♥5 | +1 | +0 |
| -1.4 | Round 3 | FORCING PROBABLY | 27 | 1NT | ♠4 | = | +0 |
| -2.2 | Round 3 | FORCING PROBABLY | 26 | 3NT | ♠J | = | +0 |
| -2.8 | Round 3 | FORCING PROBABLY | 21 | 2♠ | ♣K | = | +1 |
| -4.2 | Round 3 | FORCING PROBABLY | 28 | 3♣ | ♠6 | -3 | -2 |
| -5.2 | Round 3 | FORCING PROBABLY | 30 | 3NT | ♣5 | +1 | -7 |
| -10.7 | Round 3 | FORCING PROBABLY | 29 | 3NT | ♦2 | = | -10 |