Paul EDKINS · INCREDIBELLES N BROS
vs par split: bidding -0.55 · play -0.76
Strength of schedule: opponents averaged +0.38/bd (a tough draw) → opponent-adjusted +0.40/bd
Card play — on target: opening leads 75.0% · declarer play 66.7% · defence 83.3%
Bidding activity — not a pass: 34.2% (27/79)
| vs NT | vs a suit | |
|---|---|---|
| Opening leads | · | 75.0% (4) |
| Declarer play | 100.0% (2) | 50.0% (4) |
| Defence | 100.0% (2) | 80.0% (10) |
Opening leads by suit led: ♠ 66.7% (3) · ♦ 100.0% (1)
vs par by strain: NT -1.50 (8) · a suit -1.24 (21)
vs par by level: part-score -2.42 (12) · game -1.57 (14) · slam +4.33 (3)
By role: declaring -0.77/bd (-4.47 vs par · 17) · defending +1.15/bd (+3.17 vs par · 12)
By vulnerability: vulnerable +0.73/bd (+1.00 vs par · 15) · not vulnerable -0.69/bd (-3.27 vs par · 15)
By round↑ top
| Round | Partner | Opponents | Room | Bds | Butler | Avg | vs par |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Round 9 | Diana Eveline SERBAN | Jenish SHAH – Ramani MENON | Closed | 10 | -2.2 | -0.22 | -2.50 |
| Round 10 | Diana Eveline SERBAN | Ezgi Ece AGA – Sandro BOHNSACK | Open | 10 | +12.5 | +1.25 | +1.80 |
| Round 11 | Diana Eveline SERBAN | Jordi SABATE – Paula DE LORENZO | Closed | 10 | -9.7 | -0.97 | -2.70 |
Every board — best Butler first↑ top
vs par = IMPs this pair scored above (+) or below (−) the board’s double-dummy par — what bidding and play (theirs and the opponents’) added or gave away against perfect play.
| Butler | Round | Opponents | Bd | Contract | Lead | Res | vs par |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| +8.2 | Round 10 | FORCING PROBABLY | 31 | 6♥ | ♠6 | -2 | +13 |
| +8.0 | Round 10 | FORCING PROBABLY | 36 | 5♥ | ♠7 | -1 | +13 |
| +7.3 | Round 11 | GAUSS | 45 | 7♣ | ♦J | -1 | +17 |
| +6.2 | Round 11 | GAUSS | 47 | 4♥ | ♠4 | -1 | +10 |
| +4.6 | Round 9 | HEXAGON | 30 | 4♠x | ♠J | -1 | +5 |
| +3.7 | Round 10 | FORCING PROBABLY | 33 | 3♠ | ♦A | = | +1 |
| +3.5 | Round 10 | FORCING PROBABLY | 35 | 3NT | ♥4 | = | +2 |
| +1.7 | Round 9 | HEXAGON | 21 | 2♥ | ♦A | = | -1 |
| +1.7 | Round 9 | HEXAGON | 25 | 2♠ | ♥J | -1 | +3 |
| +1.7 | Round 11 | GAUSS | 43 | 2♥ | ♦T | +2 | -6 |
| +1.6 | Round 10 | FORCING PROBABLY | 38 | 3NT | ♣4 | +3 | +1 |
| +1.0 | Round 9 | HEXAGON | 27 | 2♦ | ♣3 | +4 | -13 |
| +0.9 | Round 10 | FORCING PROBABLY | 32 | 4♥ | ♦A | +1 | +0 |
| +0.7 | Round 9 | HEXAGON | 28 | 2♠ | ♦T | +1 | +7 |
| +0.5 | Round 9 | HEXAGON | 26 | 1NT | ♠8 | +2 | -10 |
| +0.3 | Round 10 | FORCING PROBABLY | 39 | 3NT | ♥2 | +2 | +0 |
| -0.1 | Round 11 | GAUSS | 41 | 4♥ | ♣J | +2 | -11 |
| -0.2 | Round 10 | FORCING PROBABLY | 34 | Pass | +4 | ||
| -0.3 | Round 9 | HEXAGON | 23 | 1NT | ♠3 | +2 | +1 |
| -0.3 | Round 10 | FORCING PROBABLY | 40 | 4♥ | ♣6 | = | +1 |
| -0.8 | Round 9 | HEXAGON | 24 | 3♠ | ♣4 | = | +0 |
| -1.1 | Round 11 | GAUSS | 44 | 2♦ | ♦A | +1 | -5 |
| -1.4 | Round 11 | GAUSS | 42 | 4NT | ♥6 | +1 | +0 |
| -2.0 | Round 11 | GAUSS | 49 | 4♥ | ♦Q | -1 | -10 |
| -3.2 | Round 9 | HEXAGON | 22 | 1NT | ♥3 | -1 | -4 |
| -3.8 | Round 11 | GAUSS | 46 | 2NT | ♥3 | -3 | -2 |
| -7.6 | Round 11 | GAUSS | 48 | 4♥ | ♠Q | = | -13 |
| -8.1 | Round 9 | HEXAGON | 29 | 4♥ | ♠3 | -2 | -13 |
| -8.9 | Round 11 | GAUSS | 50 | 4♥ | ♠8 | = | -7 |
| -13.2 | Round 10 | FORCING PROBABLY | 37 | 6♥ | ♣J | -1 | -17 |