DI FRANCO Massimiliano · ITA-G.S. ALLEGRA
vs par split: bidding -1.45 · play -0.50
Strength of schedule: opponents averaged -0.36/bd (an easy draw) → opponent-adjusted -2.74/bd
Card play — on target: opening leads 90.0% · defence 80.0%
| vs NT | vs a suit | |
|---|---|---|
| Opening leads | 100.0% (2) | 87.5% (8) |
| Defence | 100.0% (2) | 76.9% (13) |
Opening leads by suit led: ♠ 100.0% (4) · ♥ 66.7% (3) · ♦ 100.0% (1) · ♣ 100.0% (2)
vs par by strain: NT +3.00 (2) · a suit -2.50 (18)
vs par by level: part-score +6.80 (5) · game -5.83 (12) · slam -1.00 (3)
By role: declaring -0.88/bd (-3.80 vs par · 5) · defending -2.88/bd (-1.33 vs par · 15)
By vulnerability: vulnerable -2.54/bd (-1.00 vs par · 10) · not vulnerable -2.22/bd (-2.90 vs par · 10)
By round↑ top
| Round | Partner | Opponents | Room | Bds | Butler | Avg | vs par |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Round 1 | A.Bianchedi | V.Giubilo – L.Cima | Open | 10 | -30.4 | -3.04 | -1.10 |
| Round 3 | A.Bianchedi | L.Johansen – E.Berg | Open | 10 | -17.2 | -1.72 | -2.80 |
Every board — best Butler first↑ top
vs par = IMPs this pair scored above (+) or below (−) the board’s double-dummy par — what bidding and play (theirs and the opponents’) added or gave away against perfect play.
| Butler | Round | Opponents | Bd | Contract | Lead | Res | vs par |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| +5.3 | Round 1 | ITA-ANGELINI BRIDGE S.R.L. | 4 | 3♣ | ♥5 | -1 | +6 |
| +3.4 | Round 3 | NOR-HEIMDAL BK | 30 | 6♠x | ♥7 | -1 | +5 |
| +2.2 | Round 1 | ITA-ANGELINI BRIDGE S.R.L. | 5 | 2NT | ♠10 | -1 | +5 |
| +1.5 | Round 1 | ITA-ANGELINI BRIDGE S.R.L. | 9 | 3NT | ♣4 | = | +1 |
| +1.3 | Round 1 | ITA-ANGELINI BRIDGE S.R.L. | 2 | 3♥ | ♦9 | -1 | +1 |
| +1.3 | Round 3 | NOR-HEIMDAL BK | 23 | 3♦ | ♠3 | -1 | +12 |
| +0.6 | Round 3 | NOR-HEIMDAL BK | 24 | 4♠ | ♥Q | +1 | +1 |
| +0.3 | Round 3 | NOR-HEIMDAL BK | 28 | 4♠ | ♥A | -2 | -6 |
| -0.0 | Round 3 | NOR-HEIMDAL BK | 27 | 4♠ | ♣K | = | +0 |
| -0.5 | Round 1 | ITA-ANGELINI BRIDGE S.R.L. | 7 | 3♦ | ♦2 | = | +10 |
| -0.6 | Round 3 | NOR-HEIMDAL BK | 21 | 4♠ | ♦Q | = | -9 |
| -0.6 | Round 3 | NOR-HEIMDAL BK | 25 | 4♥ | ♣A | +1 | +0 |
| -4.4 | Round 1 | ITA-ANGELINI BRIDGE S.R.L. | 1 | 4♥ | ♣3 | +1 | -1 |
| -5.1 | Round 3 | NOR-HEIMDAL BK | 29 | 5♣ | ♦6 | -1 | -12 |
| -5.2 | Round 1 | ITA-ANGELINI BRIDGE S.R.L. | 6 | 4♠ | ♥3 | = | -8 |
| -6.7 | Round 3 | NOR-HEIMDAL BK | 26 | 4♠ | ♠4 | = | -9 |
| -8.0 | Round 1 | ITA-ANGELINI BRIDGE S.R.L. | 8 | 6♦ | ♥J | = | +2 |
| -9.8 | Round 1 | ITA-ANGELINI BRIDGE S.R.L. | 3 | 4♠x | ♣K | = | -14 |
| -9.8 | Round 3 | NOR-HEIMDAL BK | 22 | 6♣ | ♠2 | = | -10 |
| -12.8 | Round 1 | ITA-ANGELINI BRIDGE S.R.L. | 10 | 4♥ | ♠Q | = | -13 |