DUBOIN Giorgio · ITA-G.S. ALLEGRA
vs par split: bidding -1.48 · play +1.26
Strength of schedule: opponents averaged -0.62/bd (an easy draw) → opponent-adjusted +0.09/bd
Card play — on target: opening leads 72.7% #36 of 59 · declarer play 100.0% #1 of 59 · defence 92.3% #8 of 59
| vs NT | vs a suit | |
|---|---|---|
| Opening leads | 33.3% (3) | 87.5% (8) |
| Declarer play | 100.0% (2) | 100.0% (5) |
| Defence | 100.0% (3) | 90.0% (10) |
Opening leads by suit led: ♥ 33.3% (3) · ♦ 83.3% (6) · ♣ 100.0% (2)
vs par by strain: NT -1.90 (10) · a suit -0.04 (22)
vs par by level: part-score +0.67 (12) · game -0.77 (17) · slam -5.00 (3)
By role: declaring +0.40/bd (-3.00 vs par · 19) · defending +1.17/bd (+2.85 vs par · 13)
By vulnerability: vulnerable +1.21/bd (+0.31 vs par · 16) · not vulnerable +0.22/bd (-1.56 vs par · 16)
By round↑ top
| Round | Partner | Opponents | Room | Bds | Butler | Avg | vs par |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Semifinal | D.Bilde | L.Lauria – A.Versace | Open | 16 | +0.7 | +0.04 | -0.31 |
| Final | D.Bilde | J.Verhees – R.Van Prooijen | Closed | 16 | +22.1 | +1.38 | -0.94 |
Every board — best Butler first↑ top
vs par = IMPs this pair scored above (+) or below (−) the board’s double-dummy par — what bidding and play (theirs and the opponents’) added or gave away against perfect play.
| Butler | Round | Opponents | Bd | Contract | Lead | Res | vs par |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| +9.4 | Final | NED-BC’T ONSTEIN | 26 | 4♥ | ♥2 | -1 | +12 |
| +6.5 | Final | NED-BC’T ONSTEIN | 24 | 5♣ | ♦5 | = | +14 |
| +6.2 | Semifinal | ITA-ANGELINI BRIDGE S.R.L. | 29 | 3NT | ♥2 | = | +10 |
| +5.8 | Final | NED-BC’T ONSTEIN | 28 | 4♠ | ♦5 | -1 | -2 |
| +5.6 | Semifinal | ITA-ANGELINI BRIDGE S.R.L. | 23 | 3NT | ♣4 | = | -1 |
| +4.6 | Semifinal | ITA-ANGELINI BRIDGE S.R.L. | 32 | 7♦ | ♥9 | = | -2 |
| +3.4 | Semifinal | ITA-ANGELINI BRIDGE S.R.L. | 24 | 2♠ | ♦A | = | +0 |
| +3.4 | Final | NED-BC’T ONSTEIN | 20 | 3NT | ♦5 | +1 | +11 |
| +2.4 | Final | NED-BC’T ONSTEIN | 29 | 3NT | ♦5 | -1 | +6 |
| +2.0 | Semifinal | ITA-ANGELINI BRIDGE S.R.L. | 19 | 4♠ | ♣10 | -2 | +6 |
| +1.8 | Semifinal | ITA-ANGELINI BRIDGE S.R.L. | 31 | 2♥ | ♣K | = | +5 |
| +1.8 | Final | NED-BC’T ONSTEIN | 27 | 6♣ | ♦5 | = | +0 |
| +1.5 | Semifinal | ITA-ANGELINI BRIDGE S.R.L. | 25 | 3♣ | ♦J | -1 | +4 |
| +1.5 | Semifinal | ITA-ANGELINI BRIDGE S.R.L. | 30 | 2♠ | ♥9 | -2 | +8 |
| +1.3 | Semifinal | ITA-ANGELINI BRIDGE S.R.L. | 21 | 2♦ | ♠6 | +2 | -7 |
| +0.8 | Final | NED-BC’T ONSTEIN | 17 | 3NT | ♠5 | +3 | -10 |
| +0.8 | Final | NED-BC’T ONSTEIN | 19 | 3NT | ♥5 | +2 | -11 |
| +0.4 | Final | NED-BC’T ONSTEIN | 22 | 2♥ | ♦5 | = | +0 |
| +0.2 | Final | NED-BC’T ONSTEIN | 32 | 1NT | ♦5 | +1 | +10 |
| +0.1 | Final | NED-BC’T ONSTEIN | 30 | 3NT | ♥5 | +3 | -11 |
| -0.1 | Semifinal | ITA-ANGELINI BRIDGE S.R.L. | 28 | 2♠ | ♦6 | -2 | +1 |
| -0.2 | Final | NED-BC’T ONSTEIN | 18 | 6♥ | ♥4 | +1 | -13 |
| -0.2 | Final | NED-BC’T ONSTEIN | 31 | 4♠ | ♣5 | = | +0 |
| -0.5 | Final | NED-BC’T ONSTEIN | 23 | 3♦ | ♦5 | -2 | +2 |
| -2.0 | Semifinal | ITA-ANGELINI BRIDGE S.R.L. | 26 | 2♥ | ♣9 | +1 | -1 |
| -2.9 | Semifinal | ITA-ANGELINI BRIDGE S.R.L. | 18 | 3NT | ♥10 | = | -10 |
| -3.5 | Semifinal | ITA-ANGELINI BRIDGE S.R.L. | 17 | 4♠x | ♦K | -1 | -5 |
| -3.7 | Semifinal | ITA-ANGELINI BRIDGE S.R.L. | 20 | 1♦ | ♣7 | +1 | -5 |
| -3.9 | Semifinal | ITA-ANGELINI BRIDGE S.R.L. | 27 | 4♠ | ♥A | = | +1 |
| -3.9 | Final | NED-BC’T ONSTEIN | 21 | 3NT | ♦5 | = | -13 |
| -4.7 | Final | NED-BC’T ONSTEIN | 25 | 4♥ | ♠5 | -1 | -10 |
| -11.1 | Semifinal | ITA-ANGELINI BRIDGE S.R.L. | 22 | 3♠x | ♦9 | -3 | -9 |