NOWOSADZKI Michal · CONTACT CLUB GENEVA
vs par split: bidding -0.94 · play +0.10
Strength of schedule: opponents averaged +0.28/bd (a tough draw) → opponent-adjusted -0.12/bd
Card play — on target: opening leads 90.0% #6 of 58 · declarer play 80.0% #21 of 58 · defence 83.3% #35 of 58
Bidding activity — not a pass: 36.7% #40 of 58 (33/90)
| vs NT | vs a suit | |
|---|---|---|
| Opening leads | 75.0% (4) | 100.0% (6) |
| Declarer play | 100.0% (1) | 75.0% (4) |
| Defence | 71.4% (7) | 90.9% (11) |
Opening leads by suit led: ♠ 100.0% (5) · ♥ 0.0% (1) · ♦ 100.0% (2) · ♣ 100.0% (2)
vs par by strain: NT +3.89 (9) · a suit -2.77 (22)
vs par by level: part-score -1.23 (13) · game -0.59 (17) · slam +0.00 (1)
By role: declaring +0.92/bd (-3.08 vs par · 13) · defending -1.53/bd (+0.78 vs par · 18)
By vulnerability: vulnerable +1.27/bd (+0.81 vs par · 16) · not vulnerable -2.08/bd (-2.25 vs par · 16)
By round↑ top
| Round | Partner | Opponents | Room | Bds | Butler | Avg | vs par |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Semifinal | F.Piedra | C.Lorenzini – T.Bessis | Open | 16 | -26.2 | -1.64 | +0.31 |
| Final | F.Piedra | J.Hop – A.Helmich | Closed | 16 | +13.3 | +0.83 | -1.75 |
Every board — best Butler first↑ top
vs par = IMPs this pair scored above (+) or below (−) the board’s double-dummy par — what bidding and play (theirs and the opponents’) added or gave away against perfect play.
| Butler | Round | Opponents | Bd | Contract | Lead | Res | vs par |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| +11.5 | Final | BC DE LOMBARD | 28 | 3NT | ♥2 | = | +11 |
| +10.4 | Semifinal | DN1 CHAMPIONS | 21 | 5♦ | ♣2 | -1 | +5 |
| +5.0 | Final | BC DE LOMBARD | 25 | 2♠ | ♣A | +2 | +1 |
| +4.5 | Final | BC DE LOMBARD | 18 | 3NT | ♠Q | = | -1 |
| +4.3 | Semifinal | DN1 CHAMPIONS | 28 | 3♥ | ♠J | -1 | +10 |
| +3.4 | Semifinal | DN1 CHAMPIONS | 32 | 3NT | ♠7 | -2 | +13 |
| +2.6 | Semifinal | DN1 CHAMPIONS | 31 | Pass | +3 | ||
| +2.6 | Final | BC DE LOMBARD | 23 | 4♥ | ♣A | +2 | -13 |
| +2.3 | Final | BC DE LOMBARD | 22 | 4♠ | ♠4 | = | +0 |
| +2.2 | Semifinal | DN1 CHAMPIONS | 23 | 2♠ | ♥5 | +1 | +0 |
| +2.2 | Final | BC DE LOMBARD | 27 | 1♥ | ♦8 | +3 | +6 |
| +1.2 | Semifinal | DN1 CHAMPIONS | 26 | 1♠ | ♣Q | +1 | +0 |
| +1.0 | Final | BC DE LOMBARD | 21 | 5♦ | ♠K | = | +0 |
| +0.8 | Semifinal | DN1 CHAMPIONS | 19 | 4♥ | ♦3 | = | -1 |
| +0.4 | Final | BC DE LOMBARD | 24 | 4♠ | ♦A | -1 | -6 |
| +0.0 | Final | BC DE LOMBARD | 29 | 3NT | ♦6 | +2 | +0 |
| -0.1 | Final | BC DE LOMBARD | 19 | 3NT | ♠5 | +1 | +0 |
| -0.5 | Semifinal | DN1 CHAMPIONS | 20 | 3NT | ♥T | +2 | +13 |
| -0.5 | Final | BC DE LOMBARD | 26 | 4♠ | ♥Q | +1 | -13 |
| -0.5 | Final | BC DE LOMBARD | 31 | 2♠ | ♥J | +1 | +0 |
| -1.6 | Final | BC DE LOMBARD | 30 | 1♠ | ♥J | = | -2 |
| -1.7 | Semifinal | DN1 CHAMPIONS | 24 | 3♥ | ♣K | +1 | -6 |
| -2.5 | Semifinal | DN1 CHAMPIONS | 27 | 4♦ | ♠A | -1 | -4 |
| -3.2 | Semifinal | DN1 CHAMPIONS | 18 | 2♠ | ♣Q | -1 | -2 |
| -3.2 | Semifinal | DN1 CHAMPIONS | 30 | 1NT | ♠A | +1 | -1 |
| -3.5 | Final | BC DE LOMBARD | 20 | 7♠ | ♣7 | = | +0 |
| -4.5 | Final | BC DE LOMBARD | 32 | 4♥ | ♣5 | = | -11 |
| -5.0 | Semifinal | DN1 CHAMPIONS | 25 | 2♠ | ♦8 | = | -6 |
| -5.5 | Final | BC DE LOMBARD | 17 | 3NT | ♥6 | +1 | +0 |
| -11.5 | Semifinal | DN1 CHAMPIONS | 22 | 4♥x | ♠3 | = | -7 |
| -11.7 | Semifinal | DN1 CHAMPIONS | 29 | 3NT | ♣6 | = | +0 |
| -11.8 | Semifinal | DN1 CHAMPIONS | 17 | 4♣ | ♦4 | -3 | -12 |