ONDER Lale · LIO
vs par split: bidding -1.14 · play -0.83
Strength of schedule: opponents averaged -0.31/bd (an easy draw) → opponent-adjusted -2.47/bd
Card play — on target: opening leads 66.7% · declarer play 66.7% · defence 86.7%
| vs NT | vs a suit | |
|---|---|---|
| Opening leads | 0.0% (1) | 80.0% (5) |
| Declarer play | 66.7% (3) | 66.7% (6) |
| Defence | 100.0% (3) | 83.3% (12) |
Opening leads by suit led: ♦ 66.7% (3) · ♣ 66.7% (3)
vs par by strain: NT -5.71 (7) · a suit -0.77 (22)
vs par by level: part-score -4.09 (11) · game +1.23 (13) · slam -5.60 (5)
By role: declaring -2.37/bd (-6.07 vs par · 14) · defending -1.98/bd (+1.56 vs par · 16)
By vulnerability: vulnerable -2.50/bd (-3.80 vs par · 15) · not vulnerable -1.83/bd (-0.20 vs par · 15)
By round↑ top
| Round | Partner | Opponents | Room | Bds | Butler | Avg | vs par |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Round 1 | S.Sanus | M.Ticha – L.Van Den Heuvel | Closed | 10 | -36.1 | -3.61 | -3.50 |
| Round 4 | S.Sanus | S.Braatvedt – L.Sorensen | Closed | 10 | -15.3 | -1.53 | -0.50 |
| Round 5 | S.Sanus | M.Serdaroglu – E.Semercioglu | Open | 10 | -13.5 | -1.35 | -2.00 |
Every board — best Butler first↑ top
vs par = IMPs this pair scored above (+) or below (−) the board’s double-dummy par — what bidding and play (theirs and the opponents’) added or gave away against perfect play.
| Butler | Round | Opponents | Bd | Contract | Lead | Res | vs par |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| +10.6 | Round 5 | ICEBERG | 8 | 6♠ | ♣Q | -1 | +11 |
| +10.5 | Round 4 | JABULANI | 26 | 4♠ | ♥8 | = | +9 |
| +3.5 | Round 5 | ICEBERG | 1 | 2♠ | ♣2 | +1 | -4 |
| +2.1 | Round 1 | NETHERLANDS RED | 7 | 1♣ | ♣4 | +1 | +11 |
| +0.3 | Round 5 | ICEBERG | 3 | 2♠ | ♥10 | -1 | +3 |
| -0.0 | Round 4 | JABULANI | 23 | 3♥ | ♦3 | -1 | +5 |
| -0.1 | Round 4 | JABULANI | 29 | Pass | -3 | ||
| -0.1 | Round 5 | ICEBERG | 2 | 1NT | ♥K | +1 | +1 |
| -0.2 | Round 1 | NETHERLANDS RED | 10 | 4♠ | ♦6 | +1 | +0 |
| -0.2 | Round 4 | JABULANI | 24 | 4♥ | ♣A | +1 | +11 |
| -0.5 | Round 1 | NETHERLANDS RED | 6 | 1NT | ♠10 | -1 | -5 |
| -0.6 | Round 5 | ICEBERG | 7 | 1NT | ♥9 | +3 | -9 |
| -1.3 | Round 1 | NETHERLANDS RED | 5 | 4♠ | ♦K | +1 | +0 |
| -1.5 | Round 4 | JABULANI | 30 | 5♦ | ♠K | +1 | +11 |
| -1.6 | Round 5 | ICEBERG | 5 | 4♠ | ♥3 | = | +0 |
| -2.0 | Round 4 | JABULANI | 28 | 6NT | ♣6 | = | +0 |
| -2.1 | Round 4 | JABULANI | 21 | 4♥ | ♣K | = | +0 |
| -2.6 | Round 1 | NETHERLANDS RED | 8 | 6♥ | ♣10 | +1 | -11 |
| -2.7 | Round 1 | NETHERLANDS RED | 2 | 3♠ | ♥J | = | -10 |
| -3.2 | Round 1 | NETHERLANDS RED | 3 | 5♦ | ♣J | +1 | +10 |
| -3.2 | Round 5 | ICEBERG | 9 | 3NT | ♦4 | +2 | +0 |
| -3.4 | Round 4 | JABULANI | 27 | 4♠ | ♥9 | -2 | -11 |
| -4.0 | Round 4 | JABULANI | 22 | 2NT | ♠8 | -1 | -12 |
| -5.5 | Round 5 | ICEBERG | 6 | 4♥ | ♦J | = | +0 |
| -5.7 | Round 5 | ICEBERG | 4 | 6♠ | ♣2 | +1 | -13 |
| -8.7 | Round 1 | NETHERLANDS RED | 1 | 3♠ | ♦A | +3 | -13 |
| -8.9 | Round 1 | NETHERLANDS RED | 9 | 5♦ | ♠6 | -1 | -5 |
| -10.1 | Round 1 | NETHERLANDS RED | 4 | 3♠x | ♥4 | = | -12 |
| -11.2 | Round 5 | ICEBERG | 10 | 4♠ | ♥3 | = | -9 |
| -12.5 | Round 4 | JABULANI | 25 | 7NTx | ♠A | -2 | -15 |