WANG Wei · SAYD
vs par split: bidding +0.46 · play -1.00
Strength of schedule: opponents averaged +0.60/bd (a tough draw) → opponent-adjusted -1.02/bd
Card play — on target: opening leads 85.7% · declarer play 33.3% · defence 75.0%
| vs NT | vs a suit | |
|---|---|---|
| Opening leads | 100.0% (1) | 83.3% (6) |
| Declarer play | 25.0% (4) | 37.5% (8) |
| Defence | 75.0% (4) | 75.0% (8) |
Opening leads by suit led: ♥ 66.7% (3) · ♦ 100.0% (3) · ♣ 100.0% (1)
vs par by strain: NT -1.30 (10) · a suit -0.11 (18)
vs par by level: part-score -2.20 (10) · game -1.06 (16) · slam +12.00 (2)
By role: declaring -1.09/bd (-3.25 vs par · 16) · defending -2.33/bd (+3.08 vs par · 12)
By vulnerability: vulnerable -2.96/bd (-2.64 vs par · 14) · not vulnerable -0.29/bd (+1.57 vs par · 14)
By round↑ top
| Round | Partner | Opponents | Room | Bds | Butler | Avg | vs par |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Round of 32 | H.Zhao | S.Farholt – H.Caspersen | Closed | 14 | -26.0 | -1.86 | +1.86 |
| Round of 32 | H.Zhao | S.Farholt – H.Caspersen | Closed | 14 | -19.4 | -1.39 | -2.93 |
Every board — best Butler first↑ top
vs par = IMPs this pair scored above (+) or below (−) the board’s double-dummy par — what bidding and play (theirs and the opponents’) added or gave away against perfect play.
| Butler | Round | Opponents | Bd | Contract | Lead | Res | vs par |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| +5.9 | Round of 32 | DENMARK BBCF | 3 | 4♥ | ♥6 | +1 | +0 |
| +4.3 | Round of 32 | DENMARK BBCF | 8 | 3NT | ♦10 | -1 | +10 |
| +4.2 | Round of 32 | DENMARK BBCF | 1 | 3♠x | ♣2 | -2 | +5 |
| +2.6 | Round of 32 | DENMARK BBCF | 23 | 3NT | ♥6 | +2 | +4 |
| +2.1 | Round of 32 | DENMARK BBCF | 24 | 4♠ | ♣J | +1 | +0 |
| +2.0 | Round of 32 | DENMARK BBCF | 27 | 4♥ | ♠Q | -2 | +8 |
| +1.3 | Round of 32 | DENMARK BBCF | 21 | 1NT | ♥3 | -1 | -2 |
| +0.5 | Round of 32 | DENMARK BBCF | 25 | 3NT | ♥K | = | -1 |
| +0.1 | Round of 32 | DENMARK BBCF | 6 | 5♦ | ♣7 | +1 | -14 |
| +0.0 | Round of 32 | DENMARK BBCF | 22 | 4♠ | ♠3 | = | +1 |
| -0.3 | Round of 32 | DENMARK BBCF | 13 | 3NT | ♥3 | = | +0 |
| -0.4 | Round of 32 | DENMARK BBCF | 7 | 2NT | ♦3 | -1 | +1 |
| -0.7 | Round of 32 | DENMARK BBCF | 4 | 2♥ | ♣2 | -2 | -2 |
| -1.2 | Round of 32 | DENMARK BBCF | 18 | 4♠ | ♥9 | +2 | -1 |
| -1.9 | Round of 32 | DENMARK BBCF | 11 | 3♠ | ♦K | = | +0 |
| -2.0 | Round of 32 | DENMARK BBCF | 14 | 3NT | ♦4 | +3 | +10 |
| -2.1 | Round of 32 | DENMARK BBCF | 19 | 4♠ | ♣Q | -1 | -5 |
| -2.4 | Round of 32 | DENMARK BBCF | 17 | 2♣ | ♥6 | +2 | +0 |
| -2.7 | Round of 32 | DENMARK BBCF | 16 | 4♠ | ♥6 | +2 | -5 |
| -2.8 | Round of 32 | DENMARK BBCF | 15 | 3NT | ♣3 | = | -13 |
| -3.0 | Round of 32 | DENMARK BBCF | 2 | 4♠ | ♠4 | -2 | +6 |
| -4.1 | Round of 32 | DENMARK BBCF | 10 | 2♥ | ♣8 | -3 | -9 |
| -4.2 | Round of 32 | DENMARK BBCF | 26 | 3♣ | ♥2 | -1 | -5 |
| -6.1 | Round of 32 | DENMARK BBCF | 20 | 3NT | ♣3 | -2 | -17 |
| -6.4 | Round of 32 | DENMARK BBCF | 28 | 1NTx | ♣4 | +1 | -5 |
| -7.0 | Round of 32 | DENMARK BBCF | 5 | 3♥ | ♦9 | -3 | -5 |
| -9.1 | Round of 32 | DENMARK BBCF | 12 | 6♦ | ♦10 | +1 | +11 |
| -12.0 | Round of 32 | DENMARK BBCF | 9 | 6♣ | ♠3 | = | +13 |