Eilat 2012 — Teams — Group B

📅 15-18 November 2012 · Eilat, Israel

5 / 5 rounds played

Tournament standings — teams (VP)↑ top

Cumulative Victory Points. Every team continues to the knockout play-offs for final ranking — the top 2 of each group play for places 1–4, the next 2 for 5–8, and so on (each team’s target places are marked ▶ by its rank). Click a team for its round-by-round results and players below; click a round’s VP to open that match.

Standings after round 5
Place	Team	VP	R1	R2	R3	R4	R5
1▶ 1–4	Bridge Club Real	89.00	20.00	19.00	20.00	15.00	15.00
2▶ 1–4	G.S. Allegra	86.00	23.00	8.00	13.00	22.00	20.00
3▶ 5–8	Radkov Bridge Club	78.00	7.00	22.00	11.00	23.00	15.00
4▶ 5–8	Het Witte Huis	77.00	21.00	12.00	19.00	15.00	10.00
5▶ 9–12	Israel White	67.00	10.00	18.00	17.00	7.00	15.00
6▶ 9–12	Consus Kalisz	50.00	9.00	8.00	10.00	8.00	15.00

Cross-table — who played whom↑ top

Each cell is the row team’s VP against the column team (columns numbered by rank; # place, Σ total VP). Hover a cell to highlight both teams and their two head-to-head results; click a score for that match’s protocol.

#	Team	Σ	1	2	3	4	5	6
1	Bridge Club Real	89.00		19.00	15.00	15.00	20.00	20.00
2	G.S. Allegra	86.00	8.00		23.00	20.00	13.00	22.00
3	Radkov Bridge Club	78.00	15.00	7.00		11.00	23.00	22.00
4	Het Witte Huis	77.00	15.00	10.00	19.00		12.00	21.00
5	Israel White	67.00	10.00	17.00	7.00	18.00		15.00
6	Consus Kalisz	50.00	10.00	8.00	8.00	9.00	15.00

1 Bridge Club Real · 2 G.S. Allegra · 3 Radkov Bridge Club · 4 Het Witte Huis · 5 Israel White · 6 Consus Kalisz

Cumulative Butler by cross-IMPs. Each round's per-board Butler = mean cross-IMP vs that round's full field (raw / (N−1)), rounded to 0.1. Cumulative = sum of a player's per-board Butler over ALL played rounds ÷ total boards played, rounded to 0.01.

Rounds included so far (5 of 5): R1 R2 R3 R4 R5. Columns R1… = each player's Butler total in that round's match (hover a cell for its avg/board); they sum to Total.

Round	Opponent	IMP	opp IMP	VP	opp VP
1	Israel White	66	43	20.00	10.00	protocol →
	Open NSB.Drijver – S.Brink +23.0 / 20 bdClosed EWA.Dubinin – A.Gromov +0.4 / 20 bd
2	G.S. Allegra	51	18	19.00	8.00	protocol →
	Open NSB.Drijver – S.Brink +14.0 / 20 bdClosed EWA.Dubinin – A.Gromov +22.4 / 20 bd
3	Consus Kalisz	43	20	20.00	10.00	protocol →
	Open EWA.Dubinin – A.Gromov +31.4 / 20 bdClosed NSM.Krasnosselski – E.Gladysh -5.4 / 20 bd
4	Het Witte Huis	57	56	15.00	15.00	protocol →
	Open EWM.Krasnosselski – E.Gladysh -1.0 / 20 bdClosed NSB.Drijver – S.Brink +3.8 / 20 bd
5	Radkov Bridge Club	55	57	15.00	15.00	protocol →
	Open NSB.Drijver – S.Brink +2.8 / 20 bdClosed EWA.Dubinin – A.Gromov -5.8 / 20 bd
Total VP	89.00

Round	Opponent	IMP	opp IMP	VP	opp VP
1	Het Witte Huis	24	54	9.00	21.00	protocol →
	Open EWJ.Kalita – M.Nowosadzki -14.6 / 20 bdClosed NSK.Martens – D.Filipowicz -15.8 / 20 bd
2	Radkov Bridge Club	34	66	8.00	22.00	protocol →
	Open NSK.Martens – D.Filipowicz -7.6 / 20 bdClosed EWJ.Kalita – M.Nowosadzki -22.4 / 20 bd
3	Bridge Club Real	20	43	10.00	20.00	protocol →
	Open NSP.Zak – J.Zaremba -31.4 / 20 bdClosed EWJ.Kalita – M.Nowosadzki +5.4 / 20 bd
4	G.S. Allegra	12	45	8.00	22.00	protocol →
	Open NSD.Filipowicz – K.Martens -18.2 / 20 bdClosed EWP.Zak – J.Zaremba -18.8 / 20 bd
5	Israel White	37	38	15.00	15.00	protocol →
	Open EWJ.Kalita – M.Nowosadzki -12.2 / 20 bdClosed NSD.Filipowicz – K.Martens +8.8 / 20 bd
Total VP	50.00

Round	Opponent	IMP	opp IMP	VP	opp VP
1	Radkov Bridge Club	40	3	23.00	7.00	protocol →
	Open NSN.Bocchi – A.Madala +12.0 / 20 bdClosed EWA.Sementa – G.Duboin +33.4 / 20 bd
2	Bridge Club Real	18	51	8.00	19.00	protocol →
	Open EWG.Duboin – A.Sementa -14.0 / 20 bdClosed NSN.Bocchi – A.Madala -22.4 / 20 bd
3	Israel White	20	32	13.00	17.00	protocol →
	Open NSN.Bocchi – A.Madala -7.4 / 20 bdClosed EWG.Duboin – A.Sementa -6.0 / 20 bd
4	Consus Kalisz	45	12	22.00	8.00	protocol →
	Open EWG.Duboin – A.Sementa +18.2 / 20 bdClosed NSN.Bocchi – A.Madala +18.8 / 20 bd
5	Het Witte Huis	41	17	20.00	10.00	protocol →
	Open NSN.Bocchi – A.Madala +2.6 / 20 bdClosed EWG.Duboin – A.Sementa +32.2 / 20 bd
Total VP	86.00

Round	Opponent	IMP	opp IMP	VP	opp VP
1	Consus Kalisz	54	24	21.00	9.00	protocol →
	Open NSG.Paulissen – J.Jansma +14.6 / 20 bdClosed EWR.Van Prooijen – J.Verhees +15.8 / 20 bd
2	Israel White	33	48	12.00	18.00	protocol →
	Open EWJ.Jansma – G.Paulissen -5.6 / 20 bdClosed NSR.Van Prooijen – J.Verhees -12.0 / 20 bd
3	Radkov Bridge Club	50	32	19.00	11.00	protocol →
	Open EWJ.Jansma – G.Paulissen -7.0 / 20 bdClosed NSR.Van Prooijen – J.Verhees +31.2 / 20 bd
4	Bridge Club Real	56	57	15.00	15.00	protocol →
	Open NSG.Paulissen – J.Jansma +1.0 / 20 bdClosed EWJ.Verhees – R.Van Prooijen -3.8 / 20 bd
5	G.S. Allegra	17	41	10.00	20.00	protocol →
	Open EWJ.Jansma – G.Paulissen -2.6 / 20 bdClosed NSR.Van Prooijen – J.Verhees -32.2 / 20 bd
Total VP	77.00

Round	Opponent	IMP	opp IMP	VP	opp VP
1	Bridge Club Real	43	66	10.00	20.00	protocol →
	Open EWL.Fisher – R.Schwartz -23.0 / 20 bdClosed NSG.Ofir – D.Padon -0.4 / 20 bd
2	Het Witte Huis	48	33	18.00	12.00	protocol →
	Open NSR.Schwartz – L.Fisher +5.6 / 20 bdClosed EWD.Padon – A.Birman +12.0 / 20 bd
3	G.S. Allegra	32	20	17.00	13.00	protocol →
	Open EWD.Padon – A.Birman +7.4 / 20 bdClosed NSR.Schwartz – L.Fisher +6.0 / 20 bd
4	Radkov Bridge Club	22	60	7.00	23.00	protocol →
	Open EWD.Padon – A.Birman -21.0 / 20 bdClosed NSR.Schwartz – L.Fisher -26.4 / 20 bd
5	Consus Kalisz	38	37	15.00	15.00	protocol →
	Open NSR.Schwartz – L.Fisher +12.2 / 20 bdClosed EWG.Ofir – D.Padon -8.8 / 20 bd
Total VP	67.00

Round	Opponent	IMP	opp IMP	VP	opp VP
1	G.S. Allegra	3	40	7.00	23.00	protocol →
	Open EWS.Skorchev – R.Trendafilov -12.0 / 20 bdClosed NSA.Andonov – R.Radev -33.4 / 20 bd
2	Consus Kalisz	66	34	22.00	8.00	protocol →
	Open EWS.Skorchev – R.Trendafilov +7.6 / 20 bdClosed NST.Tenev – S.Nedkov +22.4 / 20 bd
3	Het Witte Huis	32	50	11.00	19.00	protocol →
	Open NSA.Andonov – R.Radev +7.0 / 20 bdClosed EWS.Skorchev – R.Trendafilov -31.2 / 20 bd
4	Israel White	60	22	23.00	7.00	protocol →
	Open NSS.Skorchev – R.Trendafilov +21.0 / 20 bdClosed EWT.Tenev – S.Nedkov +26.4 / 20 bd
5	Bridge Club Real	57	55	15.00	15.00	protocol →
	Open EWS.Skorchev – R.Trendafilov -2.8 / 20 bdClosed NST.Tenev – S.Nedkov +5.8 / 20 bd
Total VP	78.00

Cumulative Butler standings — all players↑ top

Place	Player	Team	Boards	Total	Avg/bd	R1	R2	R3	R4	R5
1	S.Nedkov	Radkov Bridge Club	60	+54.6	+0.91	·	+22.4	·	+26.4	+5.8
1	T.Tenev	Radkov Bridge Club	60	+54.6	+0.91	·	+22.4	·	+26.4	+5.8
3	G.Duboin	G.S. Allegra	100	+63.8	+0.64	+33.4	-14.0	-6.0	+18.2	+32.2
3	A.Sementa	G.S. Allegra	100	+63.8	+0.64	+33.4	-14.0	-6.0	+18.2	+32.2
5	A.Dubinin	Bridge Club Real	80	+48.4	+0.60	+0.4	+22.4	+31.4	·	-5.8
5	A.Gromov	Bridge Club Real	80	+48.4	+0.60	+0.4	+22.4	+31.4	·	-5.8
7	S.Brink	Bridge Club Real	80	+43.6	+0.55	+23.0	+14.0	·	+3.8	+2.8
7	B.Drijver	Bridge Club Real	80	+43.6	+0.55	+23.0	+14.0	·	+3.8	+2.8
9	N.Bocchi	G.S. Allegra	100	+3.6	+0.04	+12.0	-22.4	-7.4	+18.8	+2.6
9	A.Madala	G.S. Allegra	100	+3.6	+0.04	+12.0	-22.4	-7.4	+18.8	+2.6
11	J.Jansma	Het Witte Huis	100	+0.4	+0.00	+14.6	-5.6	-7.0	+1.0	-2.6
11	G.Paulissen	Het Witte Huis	100	+0.4	+0.00	+14.6	-5.6	-7.0	+1.0	-2.6
13	R.Van Prooijen	Het Witte Huis	100	-1.0	-0.01	+15.8	-12.0	+31.2	-3.8	-32.2
13	J.Verhees	Het Witte Huis	100	-1.0	-0.01	+15.8	-12.0	+31.2	-3.8	-32.2
15	A.Birman	Israel White	60	-1.6	-0.03	·	+12.0	+7.4	-21.0	·
16	D.Padon	Israel White	100	-10.8	-0.11	-0.4	+12.0	+7.4	-21.0	-8.8
17	E.Gladysh	Bridge Club Real	40	-6.4	-0.16	·	·	-5.4	-1.0	·
17	M.Krasnosselski	Bridge Club Real	40	-6.4	-0.16	·	·	-5.4	-1.0	·
19	S.Skorchev	Radkov Bridge Club	100	-17.4	-0.17	-12.0	+7.6	-31.2	+21.0	-2.8
19	R.Trendafilov	Radkov Bridge Club	100	-17.4	-0.17	-12.0	+7.6	-31.2	+21.0	-2.8
21	G.Ofir	Israel White	40	-9.2	-0.23	-0.4	·	·	·	-8.8
22	L.Fisher	Israel White	100	-25.6	-0.26	-23.0	+5.6	+6.0	-26.4	+12.2
22	R.Schwartz	Israel White	100	-25.6	-0.26	-23.0	+5.6	+6.0	-26.4	+12.2
24	D.Filipowicz	Consus Kalisz	80	-32.8	-0.41	-15.8	-7.6	·	-18.2	+8.8
24	K.Martens	Consus Kalisz	80	-32.8	-0.41	-15.8	-7.6	·	-18.2	+8.8
26	J.Kalita	Consus Kalisz	80	-43.8	-0.55	-14.6	-22.4	+5.4	·	-12.2
26	M.Nowosadzki	Consus Kalisz	80	-43.8	-0.55	-14.6	-22.4	+5.4	·	-12.2
28	A.Andonov	Radkov Bridge Club	40	-26.4	-0.66	-33.4	·	+7.0	·	·
28	R.Radev	Radkov Bridge Club	40	-26.4	-0.66	-33.4	·	+7.0	·	·
30	P.Zak	Consus Kalisz	40	-50.2	-1.25	·	·	-31.4	-18.8	·
30	J.Zaremba	Consus Kalisz	40	-50.2	-1.25	·	·	-31.4	-18.8	·

Player statistics — leaders↑ top

Top 12 in each metric — or, with a team picked as ★ My team, that team’s players. Open the full player-statistics page for every player, sortable by any column — including an opponent-adjusted (strength-of-schedule) Butler. Double-dummy is idealised — the true best play needs all four hands — so read these as tendencies, not verdicts.

vs parfull table →

#	Player	vs par
1	S.Brink	+0.57
1	B.Drijver	+0.57
3	S.Nedkov	+0.55
3	T.Tenev	+0.55
5	N.Bocchi	+0.38
5	A.Madala	+0.38
7	E.Gladysh	+0.28
7	M.Krasnosselski	+0.28
9	G.Duboin	+0.24
9	A.Sementa	+0.24
11	A.Andonov	+0.15
11	R.Radev	+0.15
1	S.Brink	+0.57
1	B.Drijver	+0.57
3	S.Nedkov	+0.55
3	T.Tenev	+0.55
5	N.Bocchi	+0.38
5	A.Madala	+0.38
7	E.Gladysh	+0.28
7	M.Krasnosselski	+0.28
9	G.Duboin	+0.24
9	A.Sementa	+0.24
11	A.Andonov	+0.15
11	R.Radev	+0.15
13	G.Ofir	+0.12
14	A.Dubinin	+0.11
14	A.Gromov	+0.11
16	L.Fisher	-0.05
16	R.Schwartz	-0.05
18	J.Jansma	-0.07
18	G.Paulissen	-0.07
18	R.Van Prooijen	-0.07
18	J.Verhees	-0.07
22	S.Skorchev	-0.20
22	R.Trendafilov	-0.20
24	D.Filipowicz	-0.25
24	K.Martens	-0.25
26	D.Padon	-0.34
27	P.Zak	-0.47
27	J.Zaremba	-0.47
29	A.Birman	-0.65
30	J.Kalita	-0.69
30	M.Nowosadzki	-0.69

Opening leadsfull table →

#	Player	on tgt
1	D.Filipowicz	93.8%
2	L.Fisher	92.0%
3	P.Zak	90.0%
4	A.Gromov	88.5%
5	T.Tenev	86.7%
6	J.Zaremba	84.6%
7	A.Birman	84.2%
8	S.Nedkov	83.3%
8	G.Ofir	83.3%
10	R.Van Prooijen	82.6%
10	M.Nowosadzki	82.6%
12	A.Dubinin	81.8%
1	D.Filipowicz	93.8%
2	L.Fisher	92.0%
3	P.Zak	90.0%
4	A.Gromov	88.5%
5	T.Tenev	86.7%
6	J.Zaremba	84.6%
7	A.Birman	84.2%
8	S.Nedkov	83.3%
8	G.Ofir	83.3%
10	R.Van Prooijen	82.6%
10	M.Nowosadzki	82.6%
12	A.Dubinin	81.8%
12	E.Gladysh	81.8%
14	S.Skorchev	81.8%
15	J.Jansma	81.5%
16	R.Trendafilov	80.6%
17	M.Krasnosselski	80.0%
18	A.Sementa	79.2%
19	G.Paulissen	78.3%
20	G.Duboin	78.1%
21	A.Andonov	77.8%
22	B.Drijver	75.0%
22	J.Kalita	75.0%
24	J.Verhees	72.0%
25	A.Madala	71.8%
26	R.Radev	71.4%
27	K.Martens	71.4%
28	R.Schwartz	69.0%
29	S.Brink	68.2%
30	D.Padon	63.2%
31	N.Bocchi	50.0%

Declarer playfull table →

#	Player	on tgt
1	E.Gladysh	100.0%
2	D.Padon	94.4%
3	G.Duboin	94.1%
4	R.Radev	90.0%
5	A.Dubinin	89.5%
6	G.Ofir	88.9%
7	S.Skorchev	85.7%
8	D.Filipowicz	84.6%
9	B.Drijver	82.8%
10	T.Tenev	80.0%
11	P.Zak	80.0%
12	R.Van Prooijen	76.0%
1	E.Gladysh	100.0%
2	D.Padon	94.4%
3	G.Duboin	94.1%
4	R.Radev	90.0%
5	A.Dubinin	89.5%
6	G.Ofir	88.9%
7	S.Skorchev	85.7%
8	D.Filipowicz	84.6%
9	B.Drijver	82.8%
10	T.Tenev	80.0%
11	P.Zak	80.0%
12	R.Van Prooijen	76.0%
13	S.Brink	75.0%
13	A.Madala	75.0%
15	R.Schwartz	73.9%
16	N.Bocchi	72.9%
17	R.Trendafilov	72.0%
18	A.Birman	71.4%
19	G.Paulissen	71.4%
20	J.Kalita	71.4%
21	A.Gromov	69.6%
22	M.Nowosadzki	68.0%
23	S.Nedkov	66.7%
24	J.Jansma	66.7%
25	A.Sementa	65.4%
26	K.Martens	63.3%
27	J.Verhees	62.5%
28	M.Krasnosselski	60.0%
29	J.Zaremba	58.3%
30	A.Andonov	53.8%
31	L.Fisher	52.2%

Defencefull table →

#	Player	on tgt
1	G.Duboin	96.4%
1	A.Sementa	96.4%
3	A.Andonov	93.8%
3	R.Radev	93.8%
5	L.Fisher	92.6%
5	R.Schwartz	92.6%
7	A.Birman	92.6%
8	S.Nedkov	92.6%
8	T.Tenev	92.6%
10	J.Kalita	92.3%
10	M.Nowosadzki	92.3%
12	D.Padon	92.0%
1	G.Duboin	96.4%
1	A.Sementa	96.4%
3	A.Andonov	93.8%
3	R.Radev	93.8%
5	L.Fisher	92.6%
5	R.Schwartz	92.6%
7	A.Birman	92.6%
8	S.Nedkov	92.6%
8	T.Tenev	92.6%
10	J.Kalita	92.3%
10	M.Nowosadzki	92.3%
12	D.Padon	92.0%
13	R.Van Prooijen	91.7%
13	J.Verhees	91.7%
15	G.Ofir	91.3%
16	N.Bocchi	90.7%
16	A.Madala	90.7%
18	E.Gladysh	90.5%
18	M.Krasnosselski	90.5%
20	A.Dubinin	89.2%
20	A.Gromov	89.2%
22	S.Skorchev	86.8%
22	R.Trendafilov	86.8%
24	D.Filipowicz	86.5%
24	K.Martens	86.5%
26	J.Jansma	80.0%
26	G.Paulissen	80.0%
28	S.Brink	71.1%
28	B.Drijver	71.1%
30	P.Zak	60.9%
30	J.Zaremba	60.9%

Biggest swings — the wildest boards↑ top

Same deal, opposite fortunes: boards where the field’s cross-IMP Butler split the widest. Swing = the best NS result’s Butler minus the best EW result’s, in IMPs; the two columns show those poles (contract, score and Butler). Click a board for its full record.

Board	Tables	Swing	Best for NS	Best for EW
Round 2 · Bd 39	6	26.4	3♥x +930 Radkov Bridge Club (+15.8)	5♠x +850 Bridge Club Real (+10.6)
Round 4 · Bd 22	6	25.6	4♠ +450 G.S. Allegra (+12.0)	5♥x +850 Het Witte Huis (+13.6)
Round 1 · Bd 2	6	23.4	5♣x +300 Het Witte Huis (+10.4)	4♠x +800 Israel White (+13.0)
Round 1 · Bd 3	6	22.4	6♣ +920 Bridge Club Real (+11.0)	6♣ +50 Het Witte Huis (+11.4)
Round 2 · Bd 37	6	22.0	5♦x +1100 Bridge Club Real (+12.6)	5♠ +100 Het Witte Huis (+9.4)
Round 5 · Bd 14	6	21.6	6♥ +980 Radkov Bridge Club (+9.4)	7♥x +100 Het Witte Huis (+12.2)
Round 1 · Bd 13	6	20.2	5♦x +500 Bridge Club Real (+10.8)	5♥x +500 Radkov Bridge Club (+9.4)
Round 5 · Bd 19	6	19.4	1♠ -200 G.S. Allegra (+10.6)	4♠x +990 G.S. Allegra (+8.8)
Round 2 · Bd 25	6	18.2	5♦x +550 G.S. Allegra (+9.4)	4♠x +300 Radkov Bridge Club (+8.8)
Round 2 · Bd 32	6	18.0	6♠ +980 Consus Kalisz (+11.2)	7♠ +100 Israel White (+6.8)
Round 1 · Bd 20	6	17.6	5♦ +600 Israel White (+10.4)	4♦ +100 Het Witte Huis (+7.2)
Round 3 · Bd 4	6	17.0	1NT +100 Het Witte Huis (+8.4)	4♥ +620 Israel White (+8.6)
Round 1 · Bd 11	6	16.8	5♦x +550 Bridge Club Real (+8.4)	2♥ +150 G.S. Allegra (+8.4)
Round 2 · Bd 27	6	16.8	2♠ -260 Israel White (+6.6)	4♠x +890 Radkov Bridge Club (+10.2)

Stages

Tables

Rounds

Eilat 2012 — Teams — Group B

Tournament standings — teams (VP)↑ top

Cross-table — who played whom↑ top

Bridge Club Real — results↑ top

Consus Kalisz — results↑ top

G.S. Allegra — results↑ top

Het Witte Huis — results↑ top

Israel White — results↑ top

Radkov Bridge Club — results↑ top

Cumulative Butler standings — all players↑ top

Player statistics — leaders↑ top

Biggest swings — the wildest boards↑ top