CARROLL John · IRISH CHAMPIONS
vs par split: bidding +0.25 · play -0.38
Strength of schedule: opponents averaged -0.60/bd (an easy draw) → opponent-adjusted -0.45/bd
Card play — on target: opening leads 44.4% #55 of 56 · declarer play 66.7% #42 of 56 · defence 100.0% #1 of 56
| vs NT | vs a suit | |
|---|---|---|
| Opening leads | 100.0% (1) | 37.5% (8) |
| Declarer play | 50.0% (2) | 71.4% (7) |
| Defence | 100.0% (4) | 100.0% (11) |
Opening leads by suit led: ♥ 100.0% (1) · ♦ 66.7% (3) · ♣ 20.0% (5)
vs par by strain: NT +0.33 (9) · a suit -0.30 (23)
vs par by level: part-score +0.17 (12) · game -0.30 (20)
By role: declaring +0.54/bd (-1.76 vs par · 17) · defending -0.27/bd (+1.73 vs par · 15)
By vulnerability: vulnerable +0.07/bd (+0.19 vs par · 16) · not vulnerable +0.24/bd (-0.44 vs par · 16)
By round↑ top
| Round | Partner | Opponents | Room | Bds | Butler | Avg | vs par |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Semifinal | M.Moran | N.Sver – V.Zoric | Closed | 16 | -15.4 | -0.96 | -1.19 |
| Final | M.Moran | A.Majcher – R.Glodowski | Closed | 16 | +20.5 | +1.28 | +0.94 |
Every board — best Butler first↑ top
vs par = IMPs this pair scored above (+) or below (−) the board’s double-dummy par — what bidding and play (theirs and the opponents’) added or gave away against perfect play.
| Butler | Round | Opponents | Bd | Contract | Lead | Res | vs par |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| +11.1 | Final | ESKOM WARSZAWA | 6 | 3NT | ♥5 | = | +10 |
| +10.2 | Final | ESKOM WARSZAWA | 10 | 5♦x | ♠6 | = | +4 |
| +9.4 | Final | ESKOM WARSZAWA | 11 | 4♠x | ♣K | -2 | +9 |
| +5.5 | Semifinal | JT2 | 30 | 3NT | ♦T | -3 | +7 |
| +4.6 | Semifinal | JT2 | 29 | 4♠ | ♥K | = | +0 |
| +4.5 | Semifinal | JT2 | 22 | 5♦ | ♣A | = | +0 |
| +3.9 | Final | ESKOM WARSZAWA | 3 | 4♠ | ♣2 | -3 | +11 |
| +2.6 | Final | ESKOM WARSZAWA | 9 | 2♥ | ♦2 | +1 | +1 |
| +2.4 | Final | ESKOM WARSZAWA | 8 | 2♥ | ♥Q | +1 | +1 |
| +1.9 | Final | ESKOM WARSZAWA | 1 | 3NT | ♥9 | = | +0 |
| +1.8 | Final | ESKOM WARSZAWA | 16 | 3♥ | ♦6 | +1 | +6 |
| +1.5 | Semifinal | JT2 | 31 | 4♠ | ♦6 | -1 | +6 |
| +1.2 | Final | ESKOM WARSZAWA | 4 | 3♠ | ♥8 | = | +0 |
| +0.4 | Final | ESKOM WARSZAWA | 14 | 3NT | ♦3 | +1 | +0 |
| +0.3 | Semifinal | JT2 | 17 | 3NT | ♣2 | +1 | +1 |
| -0.4 | Semifinal | JT2 | 32 | 3♠ | ♥6 | +1 | +10 |
| -0.5 | Semifinal | JT2 | 27 | 4♥ | ♣K | = | -1 |
| -0.7 | Semifinal | JT2 | 26 | 2♠ | ♣8 | +1 | +0 |
| -0.7 | Final | ESKOM WARSZAWA | 5 | 4♥ | ♠J | +1 | +0 |
| -0.8 | Semifinal | JT2 | 20 | 1NT | ♣A | = | -5 |
| -1.2 | Final | ESKOM WARSZAWA | 2 | 5♦ | ♠Q | +1 | -11 |
| -2.3 | Semifinal | JT2 | 25 | 2♠ | ♣7 | -2 | +0 |
| -2.5 | Semifinal | JT2 | 24 | 4♠ | ♣K | = | -3 |
| -2.7 | Final | ESKOM WARSZAWA | 13 | 3NT | ♣5 | +1 | +0 |
| -3.3 | Semifinal | JT2 | 21 | 2♠ | ♥8 | -1 | -5 |
| -3.3 | Semifinal | JT2 | 28 | 2NT | ♠9 | = | +1 |
| -3.9 | Semifinal | JT2 | 19 | 3NT | ♦5 | -1 | -11 |
| -4.3 | Final | ESKOM WARSZAWA | 15 | 2♣ | ♠9 | +1 | +0 |
| -4.7 | Final | ESKOM WARSZAWA | 12 | 5♥ | ♣J | +1 | -9 |
| -6.1 | Semifinal | JT2 | 23 | 4♦ | ♦2 | +1 | -7 |
| -8.0 | Semifinal | JT2 | 18 | 4♠ | ♥A | -1 | -12 |
| -10.8 | Final | ESKOM WARSZAWA | 7 | 4♥ | ♥2 | -1 | -7 |