DE ROOS Daniel · RIVIERA

43rank
-3.8Butler · 16 bds
-0.24per board
±4.8swing
-1.44vs par /bd
+0.29adjusted /bd
by round

vs par split: bidding -0.31 · play -1.12

Strength of schedule: opponents averaged +0.53/bd (a tough draw) → opponent-adjusted +0.29/bd

Card play — on target: opening leads 75.0% · declarer play 100.0% · defence 77.8%

Card play by contract type — on target
vs NTvs a suit
Opening leads0.0% (1)100.0% (3)
Declarer play100.0% (1)100.0% (2)
Defence50.0% (2)85.7% (7)

Opening leads by suit led: ♥ 100.0% (1) · ♦ 0.0% (1) · ♣ 100.0% (2)

vs par by strain: NT -4.00 (5) · a suit -0.27 (11)

vs par by level: part-score +0.20 (5) · game -3.50 (10) · slam +11.00 (1)

By role: declaring +0.33/bd (-4.29 vs par · 7) · defending -0.68/bd (+0.78 vs par · 9)

By vulnerability: vulnerable -2.14/bd (-1.88 vs par · 8) · not vulnerable +1.66/bd (-1.00 vs par · 8)

By round↑ top

RoundPartnerOpponentsRoomBdsButlerAvgvs par
SemifinalS.De DonderH.Caspersen – S.CaspersenClosed16-3.8-0.24-1.44

Every board — best Butler first↑ top

vs par = IMPs this pair scored above (+) or below (−) the board’s double-dummy par — what bidding and play (theirs and the opponents’) added or gave away against perfect play.

ButlerRoundOpponentsBdContractLeadResvs par
+8.2SemifinalPHARMASERVICE83NT♥4+3-10
+6.2SemifinalPHARMASERVICE44♥♦Q+1+0
+4.0SemifinalPHARMASERVICE13NT♣5-1+5
+3.5SemifinalPHARMASERVICE125♦♣K-1+9
+3.5SemifinalPHARMASERVICE143♥♦4-1+5
+2.0SemifinalPHARMASERVICE113♣♠K=+0
+0.9SemifinalPHARMASERVICE63NT♣T+3+2
+0.3SemifinalPHARMASERVICE102♠♣6-1+1
-0.3SemifinalPHARMASERVICE96♥♠6=+11
-0.4SemifinalPHARMASERVICE24♣♥2-1+0
-2.9SemifinalPHARMASERVICE162NT♠A-1-5
-3.4SemifinalPHARMASERVICE135♦♥8=+0
-3.6SemifinalPHARMASERVICE154♠♥K-1-6
-3.9SemifinalPHARMASERVICE54♥♣T=-11
-6.8SemifinalPHARMASERVICE74♠♣A-1-12
-11.1SemifinalPHARMASERVICE33NTx♦2+2-12