DE MICHELIS Luca · BRIDGE ADDAURA ASD
vs par split: bidding +0.75 · play +0.22
Strength of schedule: opponents averaged -0.27/bd (an easy draw) → opponent-adjusted -0.05/bd
Card play — on target: opening leads 88.9% #8 of 56 · declarer play 90.9% #10 of 56 · defence 93.8% #11 of 56
| vs NT | vs a suit | |
|---|---|---|
| Opening leads | 66.7% (3) | 100.0% (6) |
| Declarer play | 66.7% (3) | 100.0% (8) |
| Defence | 100.0% (6) | 90.0% (10) |
Opening leads by suit led: ♠ 50.0% (2) · ♥ 100.0% (4) · ♦ 100.0% (2) · ♣ 100.0% (1)
vs par by strain: NT +0.46 (11) · a suit +1.24 (21)
vs par by level: part-score +0.33 (12) · game +2.00 (19) · slam -11.00 (1)
By role: declaring +1.20/bd (-0.38 vs par · 16) · defending -0.77/bd (+2.31 vs par · 16)
By vulnerability: vulnerable +0.16/bd (+1.38 vs par · 16) · not vulnerable +0.27/bd (+0.56 vs par · 16)
By round↑ top
| Round | Partner | Opponents | Room | Bds | Butler | Avg | vs par |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Semifinal | G.Failla | S.Simonsen – J.Ringseth | Closed | 16 | +17.9 | +1.12 | +2.38 |
| Final | G.Failla | P.Zimmermann – M.Nowosadzki | Closed | 16 | -11.0 | -0.69 | -0.44 |
Every board — best Butler first↑ top
vs par = IMPs this pair scored above (+) or below (−) the board’s double-dummy par — what bidding and play (theirs and the opponents’) added or gave away against perfect play.
| Butler | Round | Opponents | Bd | Contract | Lead | Res | vs par |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| +11.2 | Semifinal | STUDENTENES BK TRONDHEIM | 11 | 4♥x | ♦A | -4 | +12 |
| +5.4 | Final | BRIDGE CONTACT CLUB | 4 | 4♠ | ♥5 | -1 | +6 |
| +5.3 | Semifinal | STUDENTENES BK TRONDHEIM | 3 | 3NT | ♣4 | = | +7 |
| +4.7 | Final | BRIDGE CONTACT CLUB | 12 | 5♥ | ♣J | +1 | +9 |
| +4.6 | Final | BRIDGE CONTACT CLUB | 11 | 4♠ | ♦Q | = | +8 |
| +4.1 | Semifinal | STUDENTENES BK TRONDHEIM | 4 | 2♥ | ♣3 | +3 | +10 |
| +3.9 | Semifinal | STUDENTENES BK TRONDHEIM | 5 | 4♥ | ♥6 | = | +11 |
| +3.4 | Semifinal | STUDENTENES BK TRONDHEIM | 13 | 5♦ | ♥6 | = | +0 |
| +2.9 | Semifinal | STUDENTENES BK TRONDHEIM | 12 | 3♥ | ♠A | +1 | -4 |
| +2.7 | Final | BRIDGE CONTACT CLUB | 13 | 3NT | ♣5 | +1 | +0 |
| +2.2 | Final | BRIDGE CONTACT CLUB | 2 | 5♦ | ♥3 | = | +11 |
| +1.7 | Semifinal | STUDENTENES BK TRONDHEIM | 10 | 2NT | ♥A | +1 | +1 |
| +0.9 | Semifinal | STUDENTENES BK TRONDHEIM | 14 | 2♥ | ♦K | = | +0 |
| +0.8 | Semifinal | STUDENTENES BK TRONDHEIM | 1 | 2NT | ♣6 | = | +0 |
| +0.4 | Semifinal | STUDENTENES BK TRONDHEIM | 2 | 2♥ | ♦9 | = | +0 |
| +0.3 | Semifinal | STUDENTENES BK TRONDHEIM | 9 | 6♥ | ♣6 | = | -11 |
| -0.2 | Final | BRIDGE CONTACT CLUB | 6 | 2♣x | ♦5 | -1 | +1 |
| -0.8 | Final | BRIDGE CONTACT CLUB | 3 | 4♥ | ♦Q | -1 | -10 |
| -0.9 | Semifinal | STUDENTENES BK TRONDHEIM | 6 | 3NT | ♠2 | +3 | -2 |
| -1.3 | Final | BRIDGE CONTACT CLUB | 8 | 1♠x | ♦3 | -1 | +0 |
| -1.4 | Final | BRIDGE CONTACT CLUB | 9 | 2♥ | ♦7 | = | +0 |
| -1.5 | Semifinal | STUDENTENES BK TRONDHEIM | 15 | 3♠ | ♥K | = | +2 |
| -1.6 | Final | BRIDGE CONTACT CLUB | 14 | 3NT | ♦2 | +2 | -1 |
| -1.8 | Final | BRIDGE CONTACT CLUB | 16 | 1♥ | ♦5 | +3 | -6 |
| -1.9 | Final | BRIDGE CONTACT CLUB | 1 | 3NT | ♥7 | = | +0 |
| -2.5 | Semifinal | STUDENTENES BK TRONDHEIM | 16 | 1NT | ♠A | = | +0 |
| -2.6 | Final | BRIDGE CONTACT CLUB | 7 | 4♥ | ♣3 | = | -9 |
| -3.7 | Final | BRIDGE CONTACT CLUB | 5 | 4♠x | ♥3 | -3 | -4 |
| -5.7 | Semifinal | STUDENTENES BK TRONDHEIM | 7 | 3NT | ♣2 | = | +1 |
| -6.4 | Semifinal | STUDENTENES BK TRONDHEIM | 8 | 3NT | ♥3 | = | +11 |
| -7.4 | Final | BRIDGE CONTACT CLUB | 10 | 5♦ | ♠2 | = | +0 |
| -7.9 | Final | BRIDGE CONTACT CLUB | 15 | 3NT | ♦T | -5 | -12 |