Bad Honnef 2011 — Teams — Group B

📅 17-20 November 2011 · Bad Honnef, Germany

5 / 5 rounds played

Tournament standings — teams (VP)↑ top

Cumulative Victory Points. Every team continues to the knockout play-offs for final ranking — the top 2 of each group play for places 1–4, the next 2 for 5–8, and so on (each team’s target places are marked ▶ by its rank). Click a team for its round-by-round results and players below; click a round’s VP to open that match.

Standings after round 5
Place	Team	VP	R1	R2	R3	R4	R5
1▶ 1–4	G.S. ALLEGRA	101.00	21.00	20.00	21.00	14.00	25.00
2▶ 1–4	VITO	92.00	9.00	19.00	23.00	25.00	16.00
3▶ 5–8	ISRAELI NATIONAL CHAMPION	71.00	15.00	24.00	7.00	20.00	5.00
4▶ 5–8	BC 'T ONSTEIN 2	67.00	15.00	10.00	20.00	3.00	19.00
5▶ 9–12	SKARA BS	63.00	17.00	6.00	10.00	16.00	14.00
6▶ 9–12	BTSC HANNOVER	54.00	13.00	11.00	9.00	10.00	11.00

Cross-table — who played whom↑ top

Each cell is the row team’s VP against the column team (columns numbered by rank; # place, Σ total VP). Hover a cell to highlight both teams and their two head-to-head results; click a score for that match’s protocol.

#	Team	Σ	1	2	3	4	5	6
1	G.S. ALLEGRA	101.00		21.00	25.00	20.00	14.00	21.00
2	VITO	92.00	9.00		23.00	25.00	16.00	19.00
3	ISRAELI NATIONAL CHAMPION	71.00	5.00	7.00		15.00	24.00	20.00
4	BC 'T ONSTEIN 2	67.00	10.00	3.00	15.00		20.00	19.00
5	SKARA BS	63.00	16.00	14.00	6.00	10.00		17.00
6	BTSC HANNOVER	54.00	9.00	11.00	10.00	11.00	13.00

1 G.S. ALLEGRA · 2 VITO · 3 ISRAELI NATIONAL CHAMPION · 4 BC 'T ONSTEIN 2 · 5 SKARA BS · 6 BTSC HANNOVER

Cumulative Butler by cross-IMPs. Each round's per-board Butler = mean cross-IMP vs that round's full field (raw / (N−1)), rounded to 0.1. Cumulative = sum of a player's per-board Butler over ALL played rounds ÷ total boards played, rounded to 0.01.

Rounds included so far (5 of 5): R1 R2 R3 R4 R5. Columns R1… = each player's Butler total in that round's match (hover a cell for its avg/board); they sum to Total.

Round	Opponent	IMP	opp IMP	VP	opp VP
1	ISRAELI NATIONAL CHAMPION	45	45	15.00	15.00	protocol →
	Open EWB.Westra – H.Bertens -2.0 / 20 bdClosed NST.Bakkeren – F.Bakkeren +2.2 / 20 bd
2	G.S. ALLEGRA	37	60	10.00	20.00	protocol →
	Open NSF.Bakkeren – T.Bakkeren -9.6 / 20 bdClosed EWB.Westra – H.Bertens -14.2 / 20 bd
3	SKARA BS	55	31	20.00	10.00	protocol →
	Open NSF.Bakkeren – T.Bakkeren +27.6 / 20 bdClosed EWB.Westra – H.Bertens +5.0 / 20 bd
4	VITO	23	83	3.00	25.00	protocol →
	Open NST.Bakkeren – F.Bakkeren -40.0 / 20 bdClosed EWB.Westra – H.Bertens -34.0 / 20 bd
5	BTSC HANNOVER	70	52	19.00	11.00	protocol →
	Open EWB.Westra – H.Bertens +37.2 / 20 bdClosed NST.Bakkeren – F.Bakkeren -21.8 / 20 bd
Total VP	67.00

Round	Opponent	IMP	opp IMP	VP	opp VP
1	SKARA BS	34	46	13.00	17.00	protocol →
	Open EWO.Wagner – W.Von Alvensleben -20.2 / 20 bdClosed NSM.Schueller – P.Orth +3.8 / 20 bd
2	VITO	40	60	11.00	19.00	protocol →
	Open EWO.Wagner – W.Von Alvensleben -20.4 / 20 bdClosed NSV.Khanukov – M.Felmy -7.0 / 20 bd
3	G.S. ALLEGRA	22	50	9.00	21.00	protocol →
	Open EWO.Wagner – W.Von Alvensleben -22.2 / 20 bdClosed NSM.Schueller – P.Orth -10.4 / 20 bd
4	ISRAELI NATIONAL CHAMPION	39	65	10.00	20.00	protocol →
	Open NSM.Schueller – P.Orth -31.6 / 20 bdClosed EWM.Felmy – V.Khanukov -1.4 / 20 bd
5	BC 'T ONSTEIN 2	52	70	11.00	19.00	protocol →
	Open NSV.Khanukov – M.Felmy -37.2 / 20 bdClosed EWW.Von Alvensleben – O.Wagner +21.8 / 20 bd
Total VP	54.00

Round	Opponent	IMP	opp IMP	VP	opp VP
1	VITO	49	18	21.00	9.00	protocol →
	Open NSN.Bocchi – A.Madala +3.6 / 20 bdClosed EWG.Duboin – A.Sementa +31.8 / 20 bd
2	BC 'T ONSTEIN 2	60	37	20.00	10.00	protocol →
	Open EWA.Sementa – G.Duboin +9.6 / 20 bdClosed NSN.Bocchi – A.Madala +14.2 / 20 bd
3	BTSC HANNOVER	50	22	21.00	9.00	protocol →
	Open NSN.Bocchi – A.Madala +22.2 / 20 bdClosed EWG.Ferraro – A.Sementa +10.4 / 20 bd
4	SKARA BS	44	52	14.00	16.00	protocol →
	Open EWG.Duboin – A.Sementa -21.0 / 20 bdClosed NSA.Madala – N.Bocchi +15.2 / 20 bd
5	ISRAELI NATIONAL CHAMPION	80	29	25.00	5.00	protocol →
	Open NSN.Bocchi – A.Madala +65.8 / 20 bdClosed EWG.Duboin – A.Sementa +0.4 / 20 bd
Total VP	101.00

Round	Opponent	IMP	opp IMP	VP	opp VP
1	BC 'T ONSTEIN 2	45	45	15.00	15.00	protocol →
	Open NSD.Fohrer – A.Birman +2.0 / 20 bdClosed EWS.Zeligman – G.Altshuler -2.2 / 20 bd
2	SKARA BS	71	28	24.00	6.00	protocol →
	Open NSD.Fohrer – A.Birman +14.6 / 20 bdClosed EWS.Zeligman – G.Altshuler +32.6 / 20 bd
3	VITO	17	58	7.00	23.00	protocol →
	Open EWS.Zeligman – G.Altshuler -6.2 / 20 bdClosed NSD.Fohrer – A.Birman -40.6 / 20 bd
4	BTSC HANNOVER	65	39	20.00	10.00	protocol →
	Open EWS.Zeligman – G.Altshuler +31.6 / 20 bdClosed NSA.Birman – D.Fohrer +1.4 / 20 bd
5	G.S. ALLEGRA	29	80	5.00	25.00	protocol →
	Open EWA.Birman – D.Fohrer -65.8 / 20 bdClosed NSG.Altshuler – S.Zeligman -0.4 / 20 bd
Total VP	71.00

Round	Opponent	IMP	opp IMP	VP	opp VP
1	BTSC HANNOVER	46	34	17.00	13.00	protocol →
	Open NSB.Roos – H.Noberius +20.2 / 20 bdClosed EWA.Persson – M.Goransson -3.8 / 20 bd
2	ISRAELI NATIONAL CHAMPION	28	71	6.00	24.00	protocol →
	Open EWM.Goransson – P.Johansson -14.6 / 20 bdClosed NSH.Noberius – B.Roos -32.6 / 20 bd
3	BC 'T ONSTEIN 2	31	55	10.00	20.00	protocol →
	Open EWM.Goransson – A.Persson -27.6 / 20 bdClosed NSH.Noberius – P.Johansson -5.0 / 20 bd
4	G.S. ALLEGRA	52	44	16.00	14.00	protocol →
	Open NSH.Noberius – B.Roos +21.0 / 20 bdClosed EWA.Persson – M.Goransson -15.2 / 20 bd
5	VITO	31	36	14.00	16.00	protocol →
	Open NSH.Noberius – B.Roos -6.6 / 20 bdClosed EWP.Johansson – M.Goransson -0.2 / 20 bd
Total VP	63.00

Round	Opponent	IMP	opp IMP	VP	opp VP
1	G.S. ALLEGRA	18	49	9.00	21.00	protocol →
	Open EWR.Gunev – I.Nanev -3.6 / 20 bdClosed NST.Rusev – K.Karaivanov -31.8 / 20 bd
2	BTSC HANNOVER	60	40	19.00	11.00	protocol →
	Open NSI.Nanev – R.Gunev +20.4 / 20 bdClosed EWK.Karaivanov – T.Rusev +7.0 / 20 bd
3	ISRAELI NATIONAL CHAMPION	58	17	23.00	7.00	protocol →
	Open NSI.Nanev – R.Gunev +6.2 / 20 bdClosed EWK.Karaivanov – T.Rusev +40.6 / 20 bd
4	BC 'T ONSTEIN 2	83	23	25.00	3.00	protocol →
	Open EWR.Gunev – I.Nanev +40.0 / 20 bdClosed NST.Rusev – K.Karaivanov +34.0 / 20 bd
5	SKARA BS	36	31	16.00	14.00	protocol →
	Open EWK.Karaivanov – T.Rusev +6.6 / 20 bdClosed NSI.Nanev – R.Gunev +0.2 / 20 bd
Total VP	92.00

Cumulative Butler standings — all players↑ top

Place	Player	Team	Boards	Total	Avg/bd	R1	R2	R3	R4	R5
1	N.Bocchi	G.S. ALLEGRA	100	+121.0	+1.21	+3.6	+14.2	+22.2	+15.2	+65.8
1	A.Madala	G.S. ALLEGRA	100	+121.0	+1.21	+3.6	+14.2	+22.2	+15.2	+65.8
3	R.Gunev	VITO	100	+63.2	+0.63	-3.6	+20.4	+6.2	+40.0	+0.2
3	I.Nanev	VITO	100	+63.2	+0.63	-3.6	+20.4	+6.2	+40.0	+0.2
5	K.Karaivanov	VITO	100	+56.4	+0.56	-31.8	+7.0	+40.6	+34.0	+6.6
5	T.Rusev	VITO	100	+56.4	+0.56	-31.8	+7.0	+40.6	+34.0	+6.6
7	G.Altshuler	ISRAELI NATIONAL CHAMPION	100	+55.4	+0.55	-2.2	+32.6	-6.2	+31.6	-0.4
7	S.Zeligman	ISRAELI NATIONAL CHAMPION	100	+55.4	+0.55	-2.2	+32.6	-6.2	+31.6	-0.4
9	G.Ferraro	G.S. ALLEGRA	20	+10.4	+0.52	·	·	+10.4	·	·
10	A.Sementa	G.S. ALLEGRA	100	+31.2	+0.31	+31.8	+9.6	+10.4	-21.0	+0.4
11	G.Duboin	G.S. ALLEGRA	80	+20.8	+0.26	+31.8	+9.6	·	-21.0	+0.4
12	B.Roos	SKARA BS	80	+2.0	+0.03	+20.2	-32.6	·	+21.0	-6.6
13	H.Noberius	SKARA BS	100	-3.0	-0.03	+20.2	-32.6	-5.0	+21.0	-6.6
14	H.Bertens	BC 'T ONSTEIN 2	100	-8.0	-0.08	-2.0	-14.2	+5.0	-34.0	+37.2
14	B.Westra	BC 'T ONSTEIN 2	100	-8.0	-0.08	-2.0	-14.2	+5.0	-34.0	+37.2
16	P.Johansson	SKARA BS	60	-19.8	-0.33	·	-14.6	-5.0	·	-0.2
17	F.Bakkeren	BC 'T ONSTEIN 2	100	-41.6	-0.42	+2.2	-9.6	+27.6	-40.0	-21.8
17	T.Bakkeren	BC 'T ONSTEIN 2	100	-41.6	-0.42	+2.2	-9.6	+27.6	-40.0	-21.8
19	W.Von Alvensleben	BTSC HANNOVER	80	-41.0	-0.51	-20.2	-20.4	-22.2	·	+21.8
19	O.Wagner	BTSC HANNOVER	80	-41.0	-0.51	-20.2	-20.4	-22.2	·	+21.8
21	M.Goransson	SKARA BS	100	-61.4	-0.61	-3.8	-14.6	-27.6	-15.2	-0.2
22	P.Orth	BTSC HANNOVER	60	-38.2	-0.64	+3.8	·	-10.4	-31.6	·
22	M.Schueller	BTSC HANNOVER	60	-38.2	-0.64	+3.8	·	-10.4	-31.6	·
24	M.Felmy	BTSC HANNOVER	60	-45.6	-0.76	·	-7.0	·	-1.4	-37.2
24	V.Khanukov	BTSC HANNOVER	60	-45.6	-0.76	·	-7.0	·	-1.4	-37.2
26	A.Persson	SKARA BS	60	-46.6	-0.78	-3.8	·	-27.6	-15.2	·
27	A.Birman	ISRAELI NATIONAL CHAMPION	100	-88.4	-0.88	+2.0	+14.6	-40.6	+1.4	-65.8
27	D.Fohrer	ISRAELI NATIONAL CHAMPION	100	-88.4	-0.88	+2.0	+14.6	-40.6	+1.4	-65.8

Player statistics — leaders↑ top

Top 12 in each metric — or, with a team picked as ★ My team, that team’s players. Open the full player-statistics page for every player, sortable by any column — including an opponent-adjusted (strength-of-schedule) Butler. Double-dummy is idealised — the true best play needs all four hands — so read these as tendencies, not verdicts.

vs parfull table →

#	Player	vs par
1	N.Bocchi	+1.93
1	A.Madala	+1.93
3	H.Noberius	+1.11
4	B.Roos	+1.10
5	R.Gunev	+0.81
5	I.Nanev	+0.81
7	P.Orth	+0.60
7	M.Schueller	+0.60
9	F.Bakkeren	+0.51
9	T.Bakkeren	+0.51
11	K.Karaivanov	+0.22
11	T.Rusev	+0.22
1	N.Bocchi	+1.93
1	A.Madala	+1.93
3	H.Noberius	+1.11
4	B.Roos	+1.10
5	R.Gunev	+0.81
5	I.Nanev	+0.81
7	P.Orth	+0.60
7	M.Schueller	+0.60
9	F.Bakkeren	+0.51
9	T.Bakkeren	+0.51
11	K.Karaivanov	+0.22
11	T.Rusev	+0.22
13	G.Altshuler	+0.10
13	S.Zeligman	+0.10
15	A.Birman	-0.19
15	D.Fohrer	-0.19
17	M.Felmy	-0.28
17	V.Khanukov	-0.28
19	G.Duboin	-0.61
20	P.Johansson	-0.62
21	A.Sementa	-0.74
22	H.Bertens	-1.05
22	B.Westra	-1.05
24	M.Goransson	-1.56
25	A.Persson	-1.60
26	W.Von Alvensleben	-1.66
26	O.Wagner	-1.66
28	G.Ferraro	-1.25

Opening leadsfull table →

#	Player	on tgt
1	A.Persson	90.9%
2	S.Zeligman	90.5%
3	B.Westra	88.9%
4	O.Wagner	87.5%
5	T.Bakkeren	87.5%
6	M.Schueller	85.7%
7	B.Roos	85.0%
7	H.Bertens	85.0%
9	W.Von Alvensleben	85.0%
10	K.Karaivanov	83.3%
10	G.Duboin	83.3%
10	M.Felmy	83.3%
1	A.Persson	90.9%
2	S.Zeligman	90.5%
3	B.Westra	88.9%
4	O.Wagner	87.5%
5	T.Bakkeren	87.5%
6	M.Schueller	85.7%
7	B.Roos	85.0%
7	H.Bertens	85.0%
9	W.Von Alvensleben	85.0%
10	K.Karaivanov	83.3%
10	G.Duboin	83.3%
10	M.Felmy	83.3%
13	T.Rusev	82.6%
14	G.Altshuler	80.0%
15	M.Goransson	78.9%
16	R.Gunev	77.8%
17	A.Madala	77.4%
18	A.Sementa	77.3%
19	I.Nanev	73.7%
20	V.Khanukov	72.7%
21	F.Bakkeren	71.4%
22	P.Johansson	70.0%
23	A.Birman	69.2%
24	H.Noberius	69.2%
25	D.Fohrer	60.0%
26	N.Bocchi	57.1%
27	P.Orth	50.0%
28	G.Ferraro	100.0%

Declarer playfull table →

#	Player	on tgt
1	A.Madala	100.0%
1	P.Johansson	100.0%
3	B.Roos	93.3%
4	A.Birman	92.9%
5	T.Bakkeren	91.7%
6	V.Khanukov	90.9%
7	M.Felmy	85.7%
8	F.Bakkeren	84.0%
9	P.Orth	83.3%
10	S.Zeligman	81.0%
11	D.Fohrer	80.8%
12	N.Bocchi	80.6%
1	A.Madala	100.0%
1	P.Johansson	100.0%
3	B.Roos	93.3%
4	A.Birman	92.9%
5	T.Bakkeren	91.7%
6	V.Khanukov	90.9%
7	M.Felmy	85.7%
8	F.Bakkeren	84.0%
9	P.Orth	83.3%
10	S.Zeligman	81.0%
11	D.Fohrer	80.8%
12	N.Bocchi	80.6%
13	M.Schueller	80.0%
14	M.Goransson	79.2%
15	G.Duboin	78.9%
16	K.Karaivanov	78.6%
17	B.Westra	77.8%
18	A.Persson	77.8%
19	T.Rusev	75.0%
20	H.Noberius	72.7%
21	R.Gunev	72.7%
22	A.Sementa	68.8%
23	H.Bertens	68.0%
24	I.Nanev	60.9%
25	G.Altshuler	58.8%
26	W.Von Alvensleben	57.1%
26	O.Wagner	57.1%
28	G.Ferraro	80.0%

Defencefull table →

#	Player	on tgt
1	F.Bakkeren	94.6%
1	T.Bakkeren	94.6%
3	N.Bocchi	92.1%
3	A.Madala	92.1%
5	A.Birman	92.1%
5	D.Fohrer	92.1%
7	M.Felmy	91.3%
7	V.Khanukov	91.3%
9	K.Karaivanov	87.8%
9	T.Rusev	87.8%
11	B.Roos	86.7%
12	H.Noberius	86.5%
1	F.Bakkeren	94.6%
1	T.Bakkeren	94.6%
3	N.Bocchi	92.1%
3	A.Madala	92.1%
5	A.Birman	92.1%
5	D.Fohrer	92.1%
7	M.Felmy	91.3%
7	V.Khanukov	91.3%
9	K.Karaivanov	87.8%
9	T.Rusev	87.8%
11	B.Roos	86.7%
12	H.Noberius	86.5%
13	P.Orth	86.4%
13	M.Schueller	86.4%
15	G.Duboin	86.2%
15	H.Bertens	86.2%
15	B.Westra	86.2%
18	P.Johansson	84.2%
19	R.Gunev	83.8%
19	I.Nanev	83.8%
21	G.Altshuler	83.3%
21	S.Zeligman	83.3%
21	A.Sementa	83.3%
24	M.Goransson	75.0%
25	W.Von Alvensleben	75.0%
25	O.Wagner	75.0%
27	A.Persson	70.8%
28	G.Ferraro	71.4%

Biggest swings — the wildest boards↑ top

Same deal, opposite fortunes: boards where the field’s cross-IMP Butler split the widest. Swing = the best NS result’s Butler minus the best EW result’s, in IMPs; the two columns show those poles (contract, score and Butler). Click a board for its full record.

Board	Tables	Swing	Best for NS	Best for EW
Round 5 · Bd 18	6	27.8	3♥x +930 G.S. ALLEGRA (+14.4)	3Nx +800 BC 'T ONSTEIN 2 (+13.4)
Round 5 · Bd 14	6	24.4	7N +50 G.S. ALLEGRA (+14.8)	7♦ +1440 G.S. ALLEGRA (+9.6)
Round 5 · Bd 12	6	23.2	6♠ +50 G.S. ALLEGRA (+11.6)	6♠ +980 G.S. ALLEGRA (+11.6)
Round 5 · Bd 16	6	21.0	7♠ +100 G.S. ALLEGRA (+17.0)	6♠ +1460 SKARA BS (+4.0)
Round 1 · Bd 5	6	20.8	4♥ +620 BC 'T ONSTEIN 2 (+13.2)	4♠ +420 VITO (+7.6)
Round 4 · Bd 28	6	20.6	4♠ +650 G.S. ALLEGRA (+14.4)	5♣x +550 G.S. ALLEGRA (+6.2)
Round 4 · Bd 36	6	20.6	7♥ +100 SKARA BS (+10.2)	6♥ +1460 SKARA BS (+10.4)
Round 5 · Bd 4	6	20.4	7♠ +100 VITO (+13.6)	6♠ +1430 ISRAELI NATIONAL CHAMPION (+6.8)
Round 2 · Bd 38	6	20.0	4♠ +420 G.S. ALLEGRA (+8.0)	3Nx +750 ISRAELI NATIONAL CHAMPION (+12.0)
Round 5 · Bd 10	6	19.4	2♣x +1100 G.S. ALLEGRA (+13.8)	2♥ -100 VITO (+5.6)
Round 1 · Bd 13	6	18.8	3N +600 SKARA BS (+12.6)	3N +300 G.S. ALLEGRA (+6.2)
Round 2 · Bd 27	6	18.4	5♥ +150 BTSC HANNOVER (+12.2)	6♠ +980 BTSC HANNOVER (+6.2)
Round 3 · Bd 4	6	18.2	3N +600 G.S. ALLEGRA (+11.6)	3N +200 ISRAELI NATIONAL CHAMPION (+6.6)
Round 5 · Bd 17	6	18.2	3♠x +530 ISRAELI NATIONAL CHAMPION (+13.2)	4♥ +420 ISRAELI NATIONAL CHAMPION (+5.0)

Stages

Tables

Rounds

Bad Honnef 2011 — Teams — Group B

Tournament standings — teams (VP)↑ top

Cross-table — who played whom↑ top

BC 'T ONSTEIN 2 — results↑ top

BTSC HANNOVER — results↑ top

G.S. ALLEGRA — results↑ top

ISRAELI NATIONAL CHAMPION — results↑ top

SKARA BS — results↑ top

VITO — results↑ top

Cumulative Butler standings — all players↑ top

Player statistics — leaders↑ top

Biggest swings — the wildest boards↑ top