INGIELEWICZ Zdzislaw · AUGURI WARSAW

46rank
-8.1Butler · 12 bds
-0.68per board
±3.1swing
-5.08vs par /bd
-0.84adjusted /bd
by round

vs par split: bidding -4.22 · play -0.78

Strength of schedule: opponents averaged -0.16/bd (an easy draw) → opponent-adjusted -0.84/bd

Card play — on target: opening leads 50.0% · declarer play 50.0% · defence 80.0%

Card play by contract type — on target
vs NTvs a suit
Opening leads·50.0% (4)
Declarer play·50.0% (2)
Defence·80.0% (5)

Opening leads by suit led: ♠ 100.0% (1) · ♥ 50.0% (2) · ♦ 0.0% (1)

vs par by strain: a suit -5.00 (9)

vs par by level: part-score -8.50 (2) · game -4.00 (7)

By role: declaring -0.83/bd (-6.71 vs par · 7) · defending -0.46/bd (-2.80 vs par · 5)

By vulnerability: vulnerable +0.70/bd (-5.17 vs par · 6) · not vulnerable -2.05/bd (-5.00 vs par · 6)

By round↑ top

RoundPartnerOpponentsRoomBdsButlerAvgvs par
SemifinalJ.PszczolaT.Bakkeren – F.BakkerenClosed12-8.1-0.67-5.08

Every board — best Butler first↑ top

vs par = IMPs this pair scored above (+) or below (−) the board’s double-dummy par — what bidding and play (theirs and the opponents’) added or gave away against perfect play.

ButlerRoundOpponentsBdContractLeadResvs par
+6.0SemifinalBC 'T ONSTEIN 275♦x♥2=+4
+4.3SemifinalBC 'T ONSTEIN 264♥♠8-1+5
+0.5SemifinalBC 'T ONSTEIN 223N♦4+1+1
+0.5SemifinalBC 'T ONSTEIN 244♠♦Q+3-12
-0.0SemifinalBC 'T ONSTEIN 2104♥♣T+1+0
-0.7SemifinalBC 'T ONSTEIN 2121N♥8+1-7
-1.8SemifinalBC 'T ONSTEIN 284♥♦9+2-2
-2.2SemifinalBC 'T ONSTEIN 232♣♥J-1-11
-2.6SemifinalBC 'T ONSTEIN 213♠♥A=-6
-3.5SemifinalBC 'T ONSTEIN 254♥♠4-2-6
-4.2SemifinalBC 'T ONSTEIN 2113N♥7-1-10
-4.4SemifinalBC 'T ONSTEIN 294♥♠5+3-17